The Stupendous
Bhagavad Gita
At 5:30 on the morning of July 16, 1945, in a desert area
known as the Jornada del Muerto in the Alamogordo air base, a
stupendous white flash tore apart the sky, dazzling and blinding
a small group of scientists ten thousand yards away. At this
very moment, an apparently incongruous incident took place: Robert
Oppenheimer, director of the Los Alamos Scientific
Laboratory and prime coordinator of the atomic experiment, began
to hum some stanzas he had read years before when he was
studying Sanskrit:
Divi surya-sahasrasya bhaved yugapad utthita
yadi bhah sadrsi sa syad bhasas tasya mah’atmanah
If the radiance of a thousand suns
Were to burst into the sky
That would perhaps be like
The splendor of the Mighty One.
An imaginative description of a possible nuclear explosion?
Far from it; in fact, it was a poetic rendering of the explosive
nature of mystical ecstasy written thousands of years ago on the
banks of the Ganges: the Mighty One, emanation of the Godhead,
grants an awe-struck Arjuna his first staggering insight into
the mysteries of the inner Self.
As the gigantic nuclear cloud mushroomed up to the
stratosphere followed by a doomsday roar, Oppenheimer continued
with the verses in which the Mighty One reveals Himself:
I am become death
The shatterer of worlds.
Then and there, Oppenheimer symbolized a most extraordinary
conjuction – the juxtaposition of
Western civilization’s most terrifying scientific achievement
with the most dazzling description of the mystical experience
given us by the Bhagavad Gita, India’s greatest literary
monument.
Ironically, this scientific accomplishment destroyed one of
the basic premises that had started Western scientific thinking
on its course some twenty-five centuries ago in Greece: the
integrity and indivisibility of the atom. In splitting it and
releasing its inner energy, Western science did more than devise
man’s most awesome weapon; it also symbolized the destruction
of the psychological assumptions on which the Greek philosopher
Democritus and, much later, Isaac Newton based their view of the
universe – the existence of a material, indestructible and
eternal atomos as fundamental building blocks of the material
universe.

The juxtaposition of Western civilization’s most terrifying
scientific achievement with the most dazzling description of the
mystical experience given us by the Bhagavad Gita, India’s
greatest literary monument.
***
Oppenheimer’s spontaneous
conjunction of a Hindu mystical poem with a nuclear explosion
was of great symbolic significance. Nowhere in Western
literature could he have found an almost clinical description of
mystical rapture that also fits the description of a nuclear
explosion in the outer world.
The Bhagavad Gita gives us a perfect example of this
predominance of the subjective outlook. This stupendous “Song
of the Blessed” depicts the battlefield of Kuruksetra where
two armies stand face to face on the eve of the battle. Arjuna,
one of the commanders, drives his war chariot between the lines
and, horrified at the thought of the forthcoming slaughter,
wants to call off the battle. Lord Krsna, the “Mighty One, “
who assumes temporarily the role of charioteer and incarnates
Transcendental Wisdom, urges him to fight regardless of the
“objective” consequences, and his speech is the essence of
the Gita’s message: Arjuna must fight with serenity and total
detachment because it is his duty as a professional warrior,
because he is bound by the karma of his past and has to go inexorably
through the mysterious labyrinth of his appointed duties,
however evil the consequences may seem to others. The Mighty One
emphasizes the point by saying to Arjuna: “You sorrow for men
who do not need your sorrow….Long since have these men in
truth been slain by Me; yours is to be the mere occasion….Slay
them then – why falter? Lord Krsna then adds: “Consider
pleasure and pain, wealth and poverty, victory and defeat, as of
equal worth. Prepare for the combat. Acting in this way thou
wilt not become stained by guilt.”
The immediate message: there is no such a thing as objective
reality. And the ultimate message: “Give thought to nothing
but the act, renounce its fruits (phalatrsnavairagya)….For him
who achieves inward detachment (tyagin), neither good nor evil
exists any longer here below (vigatakalmasah).
(source: The
Eye of Shiva: Eastern Mysticism and Science - By Amaury
de Riencourt p. 13 – 14 and 72 - 73).
For more refer to chapter on Hindu
Scriptures and Quotes21_40).For
more by Amaury de Riencourt refer to chapter on Quotes301_320).
For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
Top
of Page
Hindu
leaders see "alarming" growth of religious minorities
New
Delhi, Sep. 07 2004 - Hindu groups in India are expressing alarm
that the country's Muslim and Christian
populations are growing, while the Hindu population
declines. Venkaiah Naidu, president of the Hindu nationalist
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the "imbalance" in
the growth rate of different religious communities is "not
good for the country."
Naidu's
reaction follows the release of statistics showing a breakdown
of India's population by religious affiliation. The
figures showed a decline in the rate of population growth among
the country's Hindus, who now account for 80.5 percent of the
population-- as opposed to 82 percent at the last national
census in 1991. Muslim population has grown at an increasing
rate in India, so that Muslims now make up 13.4 percent of the
overall population-- against 12.1 percent in the last census.
The
ratio of other smaller religious minorities like Sikhs,
Buddhists, and Jains has remained static in the 2001 census.
Vishwa
Hindu Parishad, described the increasing growth rate of
religious minorities, and particularly Muslims, as
"alarming." The Hindu group said this was a "conspiracy
to convert the Hindu-majority India into Muslim-majority."
(source: yahoo.com
and
seattlepi.com
and deccan.com).
It
took the Registrar General of India four years to prepare the
Census 2001 report. But the UPA government took only 48 hours to
“set right” the figures and projections of the report. In
just two days, the Census Commissioner, under Congress pressure
altered the figures of the Muslim rate of growth by juggling
statistics from one table to another. Magically, the Muslims,
who were reported to be growing at the rate of 36 per cent,
actually had a growth rate that was slower than before. It is
another matter that even then, their rate of growth is far ahead
of the Hindus.
World
over, Muslims multiply at supersonic rates in countries where
they are in a minority. However, the minorities in Islamic
countries shrink by the day, till the non-Muslim population
becomes almost non-extinct. The classic examples are our two
neighbours—Pakistan and Bangladesh. Hindus have been driven
away, converted or killed, bringing their number to a miniscule.
While
the “abnormal” growth of the Muslim population in India has
grabbed a lot of attention, some important demographic changes
occurring in some north-eastern states are receiving little
notice. Nagaland now has 90 per cent Christian population,
followed by Mizoram with 87 per cent and Meghalaya, 70 per cent.
It is to be noted that the birth rate in these states has not
risen drastically, pointing to a high rate of religious
conversions.
(source: Census
politics with Muslim numbers - By
Vaidehi Nathan -
organiser.org).
New
census data in India show an increase
in the proportion of Christians in that country-- and
a much more marked increase in the number of Christian women.
India's 24 million Christians now account for 2.34 percent of
the country's population-- up from 2.32 percent at the last
previous census in 1991. The rate of population growth among the
country's Christians also rose slightly, from 21.5 percent to
22.6 percent.
(source: India's
Christian population creeps up-- especially among women).
Refer
to Joshua Project: Bringing Definition
to the Unfinished Task- Country India - http://www.joshuaproject.net/countries.php?rog3=IN
and to chapter on Conversion.
Refer
to VINDICATED BY TIME: The Niyogi Committee Report On
Christian Missionary Activities -
Christianity
Missionary Activities Enquiry Committee 1956
and
The
Sunshine of Secularism.
Hindus have long had a latent fear
that the Muslim community will exterminate it from its homeland
through demographic aggression in the form of over-breeding and
illegal immigration. There is a secret dread, articulated by
former Director General of Police, Mr RK Ohri (Long March of
Islam, 2004), that Hindus in India will meet the fate of the
Christians in Lebanon and parts of the Balkans, where sharp
demographic changes over a span of a few decades reduced the
majority community to minority status. The warning is not
without merit. The population of indigenous religious groups in
the country has steadily fallen in percentage terms over the
past 110 years, from 1881 to 1991, and this trend has
accelerated after Partition. The present controversy over
Islamic injunctions against family planning has only added to
Hindu discomfort.
(source:
The
demographics of politics - By Sandhya Jain - dailypioneer.com
- September 20 2004).
That the Muslim population in India is moving ahead of the
rest is undeniable. Whether it is rising by 36 per cent in a
decade or 29 per cent, that is the question. That all others -
Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists put together - have risen
only two-thirds as fast, too, is undisputed. The result:
Continuous decline of those adhering to Indian religions. Plain
arithmetic tells us that the numbers of those adhering to Indian
religions are going down decade after decade. From 87.24 per
cent in 1951, the followers of Indic religions came down to
86.87 per cent in 1961; 86.60 per cent in 1971; 85.86 per cent
in 1981; further down to 85.09 per cent in 1991, and now even
less at 84.21 per cent.
Just
five decades back, the Hindus lost a third of their territory
because of changes in the religious demography of undivided
India. Yet the idea of religious demography still remains alien
to the Hindu DNA. Religious demography is the theological
manifest of Christianity and Islam and is so natural to them.
They invented the critical idea of head count in religion,
something which the Hindus never knew and have never understood.
Yes, given their
experience, Hindus have a reason to feel greatly concerned by
this trend. For Hindus, India is the only geography left on
earth. Muslims populate 16 countries totally and in as many and
more, they dominate. A non-Muslim cannot practice his faith with
honour in these Islamic states.
For,
secularism cannot survive without a dominant Hindu majority. A nominal Hindu majority will not be able to
protect secularism. Only a secure Hindu majority will trust
secularism, an insecure Hindu majority will abandon it.
(source:
Census and Hindu sensibilities - By S
Gurumurthy - dailypioneer.com - September 22 2004).
Top
of Page
Satyagraha
against academic defamation of Hinduism - By Rajiv Malhotra
Flying
the flag of Colonial politics on Hinduism
Mahatma
Gandhi explained the importance of studying the
world’s religions as a way to better understand our fellow
humans.
Gandhi
specifically wanted us to use the insiders’ perspective to
study each faith:
'If you read the
Quran, you must read it with the eye of the Muslim; if you read
the Bible, you must read it with the eye of the Christian; if
you read the Gita, you must read it with the eye of a Hindu.
Where is the use of scanning details and holding up a religion
to ridicule?'
Religious
Studies in USA:
Unfortunately,
the approach in the western academy has been very different than
Gandhi’s vision. Yet, most Indians do not understand either
the rules of the Religious Studies game, or the strategies
deployed by various players who dominate it. There are over
12,000 members of the powerful American Academy of Religion (AAR),
making it one of the largest and fastest growing academic
disciplines in the west. Contrary to Gandhi’s views, the
academic discipline does not concern itself with a sympathetic
understanding of a religion. Rather, it gives the scholars
virtually unlimited power to determine the theories that they
may use - i.e. the lenses with which to interpret a religion -
and thereby privileges the scholars over the practitioners,
spiritual teachers and exemplars of a tradition.
Who
controls Hinduism Studies?
The
academy’s authority over religious interpretation and
discourse has worked especially against Hinduism. Western and
Islamic societies have had an unbroken history of
institutionalized academic study of their respective religions,
giving them a defensive shield against hostile interpretations. But
indigenous Indian centers of learning were destroyed or
dismantled over several centuries. Even after independence,
India’s policies have disregarded Gandhi’s advice, and
secularism has been misinterpreted to abolish the study of
religion in the education system.
Therefore,
other major religions supply practitioners who populate the
academic discipline, so as to ensure that the insiders’ view
is adequately represented. But Hinduism
is the only major world religion whose academic study is mostly
done by those who are not practitioners of the religion,
even though they may claim sympathy towards it to varying
degrees. While most Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Buddhism
academic scholars are members of those respective religions,
less than 20% of the academic scholars specializing in Hinduism
Studies publicly claim a Hindu identity. This lack of
self-representation, combined with the massive power given to
academicians to overrule the practitioner’s interpretations,
has had a devastating effect on the image of Hinduism. When a
nasty book gets written about Judaism, Christianity or Islam,
there are plenty of insider-scholars and who quickly refute it
to restore balance. But when major Hindu symbols and practices
are denigrated, no refutation may take place for years, or any
such the refutation gets marginalized.
Unlike
in the case of other major religions, American Hindus are not in
control over the leading academic journals, conferences,
university chairs, programs, and school textbooks pertaining to
their religion. In other words, Hindus
have lost control over the portrayal of their own religion in
the US media and education systems, and their kids are mere
consumers of whatever is dished out by outsiders. For
example, while Greek Classics are studied with great reverence, Indian
Classics are often ignored or used to denigrate Indian culture
as being primitive, exotic, irrational and lacking in ethics and
morality. Positive contributions of Indian civilization are not
taught, while problems are blamed on indigenous culture and are
over-emphasized. The colonial mindset continues in the subtle
use of language and theories.
Over
the past two years, the Hindu Diaspora has started to contest
the western academic biases. Wendy
Doniger, arguably the most powerful professor of
Hinduism Studies, was taken to task for calling the Gita ‘a
dishonest book.’ Other
academics who are her followers were challenged for depicting
Sri Ramakrishna as a homosexual child molester of the young
Swami Vivekananda, and for interpreting the Hindu Goddess as a
sex-starved wicked creature.
(source:
Satyagraha
against academic defamation of Hinduism - By Rajiv Malhotra
- India
Abroad. December 12, 2003. Page A30. Rajiv Malhotra is with
The
Infinity Foundation, a non-profit organization in
Princeton, New Jersey).
Refer
to Invading
the Sacred: An Analysis of Hinduism Studies in America
- By Krishnan Ramaswamy, Antonio de
Nicolas and Aditi Banerjee.
Taking
Back Hindu Studies - By Dr. Srinivas Tilak
Under
colonialism, Indians had to reconcile with the western inspired
studies and history of India. While a few struggled against the
received version of India and Hinduism, most Indians complied
with the dominant western view of Hinduism and its history.
Hindus allowed the history of their religion to be told to them
and, in the process, became alienated from it. They became
outsiders as they heard and read a contrived version of their
religion and its history.
The
system of education that the British introduced into India was
directly implicated in this process of alienation from Hinduism.
Hindu
concepts of yoga and spirituality, which Christianity and
western scholars of Hinduism first attempted to destroy, then to
appropriate and then to claim, are therefore critical sites of
resistance for Hindu scholars. The values, attitudes, concepts
and language embedded in beliefs about spirituality represent,
in many ways, the clearest contrast and mark of difference and
Otherness between the Hindu and western worlds. To
date, Hindu spirituality is one of the crucial aspects which the
West could not decipher, understand and therefore could not
control.
When
Hindus become the researchers and not remain mere research
subjects or the researched, the activity and direction of
research on Hinduism will be transformed.
(source:
Taking
Back Hindu Studies - By
Srinivas Tilak - sulekha.com.
For more refer to Call
For An Intellectual Kshatriya
- by
Rajesh Tembarai Krishnamachari
and
Washington
Post and Hinduphobia - By Rajiv Malhotra - sulekha.com
and
Alerting
Naked Emperors in an Age of Academic Arrogance - By
Narayanan Komerath - Swaveda.com
and
Protestant
Pedagogues Peeved at Protest Against Porn-Peddling - By
Narayanan Komerath
- indiacause.com).
For more on Gandhi refer to chapter on Quotes1_20).
For more on this debate refer to chapters on European
Imperialism, FirstIndologists
and GlimpsesIX). Also
refer to The
Post and Manufacturing Consent - By Sankrant Sanu
- sulekha.com).
When Indian academicians want an authority on
Hinduism, they usually have to go to a western scholar. (Arindam
C, once narrated at a meeting how he was sitting in some
discussion on Hinduism in India. To
resolve a deadlock on definitions of Indic categories, it was
suggested that they should call Chicago to get the answer!
Hinduism
Studies is filled with not only former missionaries but actively
practicing missionaries. Go to RISA (Religion In South Asia)
events and you will find out. A prominent example is John
Carman, who recently retired from Harvard where he headed
Hinduism Studies, and who is regarded amongst the most important
authorities in academic Hinduism Studies. After retirement, he
has returned to his family’s mission – his family is
third-generation Christian missionaries in India.
(source:
Is
Hindutva The Indian Left's 'Other'? – By Rajiv Malhotra
-
outlookindia.com).
Also
Refer to Indic
Challenges to the Discipline of Science and Religion - By
Rajiv Malhotra).
***
What is the 'political' agenda
behind American studies of South Asian Tantra? - By Rajiv
Malhotra
(David
White’s book undermines
claims of Indian Spirituality) -
strange and slanted scholarship
Scholars’
intellectual products appear harmless at first, but eventually
work their way through the distribution systems of knowledge and
opinion into the hands of evangelists
and other Hinduphobics. The Aryan theory was once just an
academic theory but later got deployed politically to cause
divisiveness in
India
. Caste started as a colonial census system of
classifying the subjects of the Empire to be able to administer
rule over them, but was often biased by forced mappings and
imagined linkages. Over time, the earlier flexible Indian jâtis
got rigidified into a permanent hierarchy, by force of law. Once
labels and classifications get institutionalized (which the West
has the power and experience to do), the category-grid becomes a
tool over others.
A
common trope for scholars is to claim to be “saving”
Hinduism from past distortions, when, in fact, they are merely
applying a new coat of their own brand of distortion on top of
the previous layers. To make this strategy work, the scholar
first starts off by severely criticizing colonialists and others
for their biases, and this serves to gain credibility among the
gullible desis
[
(source:
What
is the 'political' agenda behind American studies of South Asian
Tantra? - By Rajiv Malhotra).
Refer to Hindus
and Scholars - By Arvind Sharma).
Top
of Page
Why
the East is superior to the West
Within
the religious fanaticism you will find a basic lack of
understanding of other religions. A comprehensive study of
various religions would support the broader view that one
supreme and caring Intelligence has expressed itself to
different people at different time and in different ways.
Fanaticism
comes to people who feel insecure.
This broader view gives a sense of belongingness while still
allowing people to be well-founded in their own tradition.
There are ten major religions in the world, six from the far
east and four from the Middle East. In the Far East, Hinduism
is the oldest.
Then came Buddhism, Jainism, Taoism, Shintoism and Sikhism. From
the Middle East, Zoroastrianism is the oldest, and then came
Judaism, Christianity and Islam.Three of the Middle Eastern
religions are rooted in the Old Testament: Islam, Christianity
and Judaism. In the Far East Shintoism and Taoism have
completely separate sources. Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism have
roots in Hinduism.
The
six religions of the Far East have peacefully coexisted and
intermingled over the centuries. Buddhism
and Taoism have so completely accepted each other that you can
find statues of Buddha in Taoist temples. Hinduism
accepts Jainist and Buddhist thought.
Contrarily,
the religions of the Middle East with a common root have warred
with each other. The brothers of the same house fight while
friends live with each other in a coherent manner.
And we can find a model in India also. Within one family you
will find Jains and Hindus and Sikhs. Individuals are free to
choose whatever representation of Divinity they wish. They are
not expected to adhere to the choice of the father or mother.
This coexistence can happen when we put values first and symbols
and practices second.
(source:
Why
the East is superior to the West - chinadaily.com). For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
God Wars: The
triumph of the jealous Gods
The Battle for
Humanity's Soul
Today,
there is an unfair bias in the contest of conversions because
the two largest, best-financed and most widespread faiths—the
"Jealous-God" religions of Christianity and
Islam—got that way by conquest and persecution. The monopoly
that Christianity has on the Americas, Australia, and much of
sub-Saharan Africa and Europe is a strength for that faith—they
can keep these areas free of competition with little effort
while pouring their propaganda and "charity" into
targeted regions where other religions struggle to emerge and
recover from the impact of European colonialism and forced
conversions. Islam’s dominance of the Middle East,
Indonesia, and North Africa is a similar fortress.
(source: God
Wars: The triumph of the jealous Gods).
For more refer to chapter on Conversion.
Refer
to VINDICATED BY TIME: The Niyogi Committee Report On
Christian Missionary Activities -
Christianity
Missionary Activities Enquiry Committee 1956
and
The
Sunshine of Secularism.
Polytheism embraces
pluralism
Monotheism
blamed for history's bloodshed
Jonathan
Kirsch blames the leading monotheistic
religions — Judaism, Christianity and Islam — for
much of history's bloodshed. The reason, he
maintains, is monotheism's traditional claim to exclusive
possession of absolute truth.Too bad Julian the Apostate, the
Roman Empire's last pagan emperor, died young in battle, says
Kirsch, author of God
Against The Gods: The History Of The War Between Monotheism And
Polytheism. Had Julian lived longer, he might
have succeeded in reinstating classical Greco-Roman polytheism,
which was marginalized when Emperor Constantine the Great
institutionalized Christianity's ascendancy — and world
history might have turned out more benign.
Polytheism, the belief
that there can be more than one god, was the ancient world's
dominant religious system. Today
it survives chiefly in Hinduism, in tribal
traditions, in Afro-Caribbean faiths, and in Wicca and other
neo-pagan movements that are growing in North America and
Western Europe. Polytheism's core value, is theological
pluralism, a stark contrast to traditional monotheism's penchant
for insisting that the "One God" demands theological
conformity.
(source: Monotheism
blamed for history's bloodshed
- thestar.com).
Top
of Page
The
city of Ayuthaya in Thailand
The city of
Ayuthaya is located about 70 km north of Bangkok. King
Ramathibodi who named it after the birthplace of Lord Rama
founded it in 1350. He envisaged "Ramarajya"
for his Kingdom, as the King was "Devaraja"
or "God King", particularly Vishnu incarnate. Ayuthaya
was a glorious, wealthy and flourishing island-city located at
the confluence of three rivers, the Chao Phraya, the Pasak, and
the Lopburi. It was the envy of not only its neighbors but also
visiting and trading Europeans. It housed a population of 1
million comprising not just Thais but people belonging to some
40 nationalities. The French visitor Jean de Lacombe has
recorded in awe that the palace of the King, Lord Rama Incarnate
according to the Thais, "Is a dwelling worthy of an Emperor
of the whole world". In its heydays it has been recorded by
outside observers that Ayuthaya city was so magnificent that
London at the time seemed a mere village in comparison.
Even though
Ayuthaya was razed to the ground, neither did the religious
fervor of the Thais suffer nor was there any damage done to the
legacy of Rama.
On
the contrary, the Thais believe the "Chakri" (or
Vishnu Chakra -"Wheel") dynasty has given them an
unbroken succession of Rama incarnates so that they may be ruled
over by his divine blessings.

King Rama IX’s
residence is named Chitralada. The Thai national and royal
emblem is the Vishnu vahana of Garuda.
***
King Rama IX’s
residence is named Chitralada. The Thai national and royal
emblem is the Vishnu vahana of Garuda. It
is interesting to note the pervasive influence of Hinduism in
Thailand even today. The Hindu Trinity of Brahma, Shiva and
Vishnu are worshipped with unrelenting reverence. Vishnu and his
avatar of Rama are obviously the most revered of all. The walls
of the magnificent Temple next to the King’s Grand Palace have
mural scenes from the entire story of Ramayana painted on them. This
temple was modelled closely on the destroyed Ayuthaya temple.
Rama’s Sita has not been forgotten either. In the "Royal
Field", north of the temple, that is the traditional site
for royal cremations and for the royal ‘Ploughing ceremony’,
a statue of Mae Thorani ("Mother Earth") stands on a
white pavilion. As
the original manuscript containing the Ramayana was burnt in
Ayuthaya’s carnage, King Rama I wrote the Thai version of Ramayana
called Ramakien in a poetic format. His son, Rama II, penned a
much shorter adaptation of it. It is this story that is the main
feature in classical Thai dance-drama to this day.
(source: Ayuthaya
- outlookindia.com). For more refer to chapters on Hindu
Scriptures. For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
Jakarta
- name is derived from Ayodhya Karta
Jakarta, the
capital of Indonesia. The city’s names is derived from Ayodhya
karta. Central Java cherishes temples of Shiva and Vishnu
reminiscent of Indian architecture in the city of Kancheepuram
in South India. And what is breathtaking is the gallery of
bas-relief sculptures depicting scenes from the Ramayana. The
ancient city of Prambanan is also the venue that attracts
artists in dance-drama style to present tales from the Ramayana.
(source: indoprofile.com).
***
Top
of Page
India
Plans to Restore Afghan Hindu Temples
The
years of war in Afghanistan has damaged or completely destroyed
ancient temples in the country. For instance, the Shor Bizar
area of old Kabul -- once the Indian heart of the city -- is now
in ruins. And
the area boasts of a 500-year-old Shiv Mandir.
Jitender Sharma, the priest, succeeds his father and
grandfather, who have been pujaris at the temple. "It
is a Bhaironath temple. Religious threads used to be tied here
and kirtans used to be sung, but for years all that has
stopped," said Jitender Sharma, priest. The temple was
destroyed by the forces of the northern warlord General Dostum
in the mid 90s. But there is renewed hope for the temple, as it
will soon be re-built by the government of India.
"The government of Afghanistan has approached us for help
in the reconstruction of places of worship of all faiths and we
are responding positively to that," said Vivek Katju,
Indian Ambassador to Afghanistan. But it's not just places of
worship. Shor Bizar used to be the old Indian quarter of Kabul
and as many as 60,000 Indians once lived in the area. Now, there
are less than 20 families and they fondly remember the days when
the area
was known as the Hindu Guzar.
(source: India
Plans to Restore Afghan Hindu Temples
- msn.co.in
- Kabul,
Afghanistan.December 28,2003 - For more on Afghanistan refer to
chapter GlimpsesII).
Top
of Page
India
and Ling
Yin Temple of China
Lin
Yin Temple of China is home to the 19-metre-high Golden
Buddha statue. Inscriptions found in the temple say the statue came flying
from India.
Fei Lai Feng - Peak Flown From Afar (also named Ling Jiu Feng), stands next to Lin Yin Temple
and is a must-see in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province. There are many
legends about the peak's name. A
well-known legend states that an Indian monk named Huili arrived
in the valley 1,600 years ago and was surprised to see a peak so
dissimilar from any other one in the valley. He believed that
the peak had flown over from India because the shape, although
unique in China, was common in India. However, he did
not know why the peak would have flown to this spot so far from
his country.

Inscriptions found in the temple say the statue came
flying from India. Big Wild Goose Pagoda - Dayanta -
Sanskrit scriptures he had brought back from India.
***
Big
Wild Goose Pagoda (Da Yan Ta - Dayanta) which was
built in 652 AD in the Tang Dynasty. Xuanzang, a prominent
Buddhist scholar of the time, planned to have a huge stone
pagoda built to house the Sanskrit
Buddhist scriptures he had brought back from India to
China. It contains a large volume of Buddhist scriptures which were
obtained from India by the eminent monk Xuanzang. The pagoda was modeled after the one
in India. It was given the same name in memory of
Xuan Zang in praise of Buddhism.
(source:
Ling
Yin Temple and travelchinaguide.com
and visitchina.
For
more refer to chapter on India
and China).
For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
Chinese
New Year and medicine
Dates from 2600 BC - A complete cycle takes 60 years, divided into 12 year
elements. Each of these 12 years is named after an animal
favored by the Buddha.
Chinese
medicine, was influenced by Ayurveda, and similarities include
the extensive use of natural herbs.
(source:
China
welcomes the New Year - BBC and Balm
from the East - By Jenny Hontz - LA Times). Chinese 60 year cycle has
strong resemblance to Tamil Calendar and Indian Hindu Calendars.
For more refer to The
Tamil Calendar).
Top
of Page
'Mahabharatha
part of Indonesia's culture, too' - says
Salahudi M Salam
Mahabharatha
and Ramayana are part of the culture of not only India but also
that of Indonesia , says Salahudi M
Salam, a Deputy Minister
from the south-east Asian country.
'Mahabharatha
and Ramayana are part of our culture and India is my home
country and not a foreign country to me'.
Salam, Deputy Minister and
Counsellor, Embassy of Republic of Indonesia, New Delhi, said,
'though our nation has a Muslim population of more than 80 per
cent, the two great epics - Mahabharatha and Ramayana have
become our philosophy and life'. Sanskrit was being taught as a
second language in Indonesia,
he said at the conference held as part of the Peetarohana
Swarna Jayanthi celebrations of Sri Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal,
the Sankaracharya of Kanchi Sankara Mutt.
The
Java language had most of the words with Sanskrit roots. The
husband was called 'Swami' and the wife as 'Stree'. Further, the
symbol of the big university in Indonesia was Lord Ganesha and
the 100 Rupia currency had Ganesha's picture in it, he pointed
out.
(source:
Mahabharatha
part of Indonesia's culture, too - newstodaynet.com).
Top
of Page
Does South Asian Studies Undermine
India? - By Rajiv Malhotra
The last two centuries of Indological
studies have focused on the themes of divisiveness among Indians.
This is today accomplished by constructing identities of
victimhood with other Indians depicted as culprits:
i. Western feminists are telling Indian women that they are
victims of Indian culture. ii. Dalit activists are being
sponsored to blame Brahmins.iii. The divisive Aryan theory is
being used as 'fact' to construct a separate Dravidian identity
and to 'Aryanize' North Indians as foreign culprits. And
iv. India's English language media is sometimes subverting
traditions by glorifying everything Western and denigrating or
ignoring everything indigenous.

The ultimate game plan of such
scholarship is to facilitate the conceptual breakup of India, by
encouraging the paradigms that oppose its unity and integrity.
Many humanities scholars blatantly promote smaller nation states
instead of one India.
(source: India
- By Adrian Mayer).
Refer
to Invading
the Sacred: An Analysis of Hinduism Studies in America
- By Krishnan Ramaswamy, Antonio de
Nicolas and Aditi Banerjee.
***
The ultimate game plan of such
scholarship is to facilitate the conceptual breakup of India, by
encouraging the paradigms that oppose its unity and integrity.
Many humanities scholars blatantly promote smaller nation states
instead of one India.
(source: Does
South Asian Studies Undermine India? - By Rajiv Malhotra
- rediff.com). Refer to Taking
Back Hindu Studies - By
Srinivas Tilak and For more
refer to Call
For An Intellectual Kshatriya
- by
Rajesh Tembarai Krishnamachari.
For more visit chapters on Women
in Hinduism, Caste
System, Aryan
Invasion Theory and FirstIndologists).
For more refer to The
War against Hinduism - By Stephen Knapp).
For interesting
articles refer to Prof.
Courtright's Pseudo-psychoanalytic Depiction of Shri
Ganesha:
Authentic
Scholarship or Bigotry? -
By
Shree S. Vinekar, MD and
Concerned
Community and Animal
House: The South Asian Religious Studies Circus and
Also Refer to
Indic
Challenges to the Discipline of Science and Religion - By
Rajiv Malhotra).
Icons of
American Literature, such as Emerson,
Thoreau,
Whitman,
Eliot,
the Beats, among others, were deeply involved in the
study and practice of Indian philosophy and spiritual
traditions. While
they are widely read and admired, the
Indian wellsprings of their inspiration is often downplayed,
to the detriment of all students.
Everything
good about India is assumed to have been imported:
The British gave us a sense of
nation. There was no worthy Indian culture prior to the Mughals.
The Greek brought philosophy and mathematics to India. The
"Aryans" brought Sanskrit. By implication, Indians are
doomed to dependency, which contradicts the vision of India's
future trajectory being based on knowledge-based industries.
Many Indian
scholars in the humanities, journalists, and
'intellectuals' in Non-Government Organizations depend on
Western funding, Western sponsored foreign travel, acquiring
legitimacy in the eyes of Western institutions, the ability to parrot
canned Western 'theories,' and even identifying as a
member of the Western Grand Narrative – not as options but as
necessary conditions for success. Clearly, such loyalties,
identities and ideologies must resonate with their sponsors.
(source: Repositioning
India's brand - By Rajiv Malhotra -
rediff.com).
"India
is fair game for every outsider who wishes to assert his own
'influence' on its cultural and intellectual accomplishments.
It is, however, curious that such influence extends only to
areas that are today considered highly
desirable. Has anyone
ever claimed to have influenced the institution of caste? No
sir, that is a wholly indigenous achievement!"
(source
: comments on sulekha.com).
For
more on this debate refer to chapter on GlimpsesIX).
Top
of Page
James
Laine's Controversial Book, Shivaji: Hindu King in Islamic
India - By Balchandrarao C Patwardhan and
Amodini
Bagwe
Some
of the remarks made by James
Laine,
Professor and Chair of Religious
Studies, Macalester
College, in his book,
Shivaji: Hindu King in Islamic India, seem more like
willful, calculated sensationalism than honest scholarship.
To
suggest that Shahaji was not Shivaji's `biological father' is
implausible, incredible and outrageous! Unlike
lax norms of familial or marital propriety that characterize
`civilized' Western societies,
loose speculation about someone's ancestry is a very serious
matter indeed even in contemporary Indian ethos, not to speak of
conditions three centuries ago when societal sanctions must
decidedly have been immensely more rigid and consequences of
their transgression, all too tragic. A scandalous
event like the one implied in the book could scarcely have
escaped immediate detection, judgment and censure. Anybody
indulging in such conduct would have courted severe social
stigma, especially someone like Jijabai who both hailed from and
was married into aristocracy. The progeny of an allegedly
`unholy' relationship would never have been accepted as king by
a tradition-bound people who looked upon the monarch as an
incarnation of Divinity! On page 93 of the book, Laine states
what could be described as out-and-out hearsay: "Maharashtrians
tell jokes naughtily suggesting that his guardian Dadaji Konddev
was his (Shivaji's) biological father"! The
ordinary reader may well wonder whether seemingly casual
inclusion of naughty gossip is a convention in serious
cross-cultural scholarship! As a matter of fact, love
and adoration of Shivaji is the bottomline truth, and we have
never come across such a motivated rumour until Laine's book was
published!
On
page 91, Laine asks with an unnecessary soupçon of
dramatization, "Can one imagine a narrative of Shivaji's
life in which, for example: Shivaji had an unhappy family life?
Shivaji had a
harem? Shivaji was uninterested in the religion of bhakti
saints? Shivaji's personal ambition was to build a kingdom, not
liberate a nation? Shivaji lived in a cosmopolitan Islamicate
world and did little to change that fact?" Had he really
read and gleaned anything from the references listed at the end
of the book, such considerations would not have emerged to
perturb him. For instance, it was practically de rigeur for men
of status in Shivaji's time to have more than one wife. To go
much further back, let us recall that Lord Rama's father too had
several queens. The custom had nothing whatsoever to do with
practices prevailing in a "cosmopolitan Islamicate
world". However, isn't having several legally wedded wives
very different from keeping a harem?
Also,
as Shivaji's biography reveals, he was surrendered to sages like
Sant Ramdas and the pre-eminent bhakti poet,
Sant Tukaram, of which
well-known fact Laine feigns such complete ignorance!
With adequate answers to each one of Laine's questions easily
obtainable in his references, is his
pretence indicative of a deeper, sinister motive to compromise,
restrain and perhaps even destroy the extraordinary reverence in
which Shivaji is held? The learned author, in spite
of his protracted contact with the region since 1977, failed to
realize that the "Shivaji story", as narrated in every
Maharashtrian home, has far more significance and enjoys
immensely greater credibility than all the `history' taught in
academia. Shivaji was the first Indian leader in relatively
recent history to contemplate political self-determination and
successfully put it into practice at a time when all others were
blissfully unaware of both the existence and possibility of such
a thing! Such visionary quality alone elevates Shivaji to a
pioneering `national' stature, head and shoulders above all his
peers and contemporaries.
Indeed,
since it takes a foreigner to convince us of the greatness of
things indigenous, it would be pertinent to quote Bamber
Gascoigne: "He (Shivaji)
taught the modern Hindus to rise to the full stature of their
growth. So, when viewed with hindsight through twentieth century
glasses, Aurangzeb on the one side and Shivaji on the other come
to be seen as key figures in the development of India. What
Shivaji began Gandhi could complete ……and what Aurangzeb
stood for would lead to the establishment of the separate state
of Pakistan."

Shivaji
Maharaj Sant Ramdas
"Shivaji)
taught the modern Hindus to rise to the full stature of their
growth. So, when viewed with hindsight through twentieth century
glasses, Aurangzeb on the one side and Shivaji on the other come
to be seen as key figures in the development of India. What
Shivaji began Gandhi could complete ……and what Aurangzeb
stood for would lead to the establishment of the separate state
of Pakistan." - says Bamber Gascoigne
***
Most
Indian historians and writers, including justice M.I. Ranade and
B.G. Tikak, laud him as the father of Indian nationalism and a
liberationist. Ranade portrays Shivaji as the architect of
Maratha independence, who promoted religious tolerance and the
egalitarian status of women. Leaders such as Lala Lajpat Rai,
Tilak, Annie Besant, Aurobindo Ghosh, Jawaharlal Nehru, eminent
historian Sir Jadhunath Sarkar, Indira Gandhi, and poet Tagore
have paid eloquent tributes to Shivaji as a great national
leader and the builder of the country.
***
Laine's
dissertation the same intellectual chicanery attempted through
the purchase by British colonizers (for a princely sum of Ł3000,
paid in easy installments, may it be noted!) of Max Muller's
erudition a century ago with the studied intention of
demoralizing a whole nation by denigration of its antiquity,
pre-eminence, culture, religion and history? Laine
mentions in the Acknowledgments (p. viii) that his
"scholarly home has been the Bhandarkar Oriental Research
Institute in Pune" where he "profited from advice and
assistance", and goes further to thank Marxist historian -
Asghar Ali Engineer – whose interest in the Shivaji story is a
new revelation to us…...
Laine
concludes that Shivaji
used pan-Indian symbols and not regional ones - if that is so,
the case that he was a nationalist is strengthened, not
weakened. If he used Maratha symbols exclusively, then he
would be a Maratha nationalist and not an Indian
nationalist...Refer to Shivaji:
Portrait of an Early Indian By Dosabhai Framji Karaka. In the preface
Karaka explains that in using the phrase early Indian" in
the title his purpose was to show that three hundred years ago Shivaji
was thinking in terms of India as a national unity. In the book
Shivaji is portrayed as a national rather than a regional
figure. It concludes with the following passage:
"
...by birth a Hindu, by caste a Maratha but by his own
inclination [Shivaji was] an early Indian who fought to preserve
the native heritage of the people of the land from the foreign
invaders, at that time Moghul and Muslim, but to Shivaji's way
of thinking, it could
have been anyone else" (Karaka 1969: p. 167).
It
is up to Laine to inform his readers as to how and where he dug
up this disgusting rumour casting aspersions upon the character
of Shivaji's mother, who is herself a figure of great veneration
to all. She was a single mother of great character and
substance: the fountainhead of inspiration of Shivaji's life's
work. The
body fabric of a resurgent India, and particularly that of a
progressive state like Maharashtra, can well do without such
vicious 'scholarship' inflicting upon it further damage.
(source: James
Laine's Controversial Book, Shivaji: Hindu King in Islamic
India- By Balchandrarao C Patwardhan and
Amodini
Bagwe -
Hindu
Vivek Kendra and yahoogroups -
Indic Civilization).
For more on Shivaji refer to chapter on Glimpses
VIII and Glimpses IX).
A Book review Shivaji:
‘Research should be taken with the altruistic aim of
benefiting humanity’
and An
image that might be disturbing - V.N. Datta -
tribuneindia.com.
Shivaji:
Portrait of an Early Indian By Dosabhai Framji Karaka - (Bombay:
The Times of India Press 1969). Grant
Duff in his History of the
Mahratta described
Shivaji as a plunderer and a freebooter. For
more on British Imperial Plunder refer to chapters on European
Imperialism and Glimpses
VIII). Also
refer to The
Post and Manufacturing Consent - By Sankrant Sanu
- sulekha.com).
(Note:
Perhaps Prof. James Laine should consider writing a book on
American cultural icon such as Thomas
Jefferson and his relationship with black slave Sally Hemings).
Prime
Minister Vajpayee made it clear to an audience in Mumbai that he
was personally against the banning of books. In the best
traditions of Hindu pluralism
and Anglo-Saxon liberalism, he made the necessary distinction
between contesting an idea and suppressing it by official
diktat.
The
ban imposed on Laine’s work by the Congress-Nationalist
Congress Party government in Maharashtra matches the earlier
acts of cussedness and stupidity of earlier Congress governments
in the Centre and the states. From Salman Rushdie’s Satanic
Verses to Charles Bettelheim’s India
Independent and Stanley Wolpert’s
Nine Hours to Rama,
India has a chequered history of liberal proscription.
At
a time when the United States of America perceives India as a
strategic partner, both economically and politically, does it
behove the American academic establishment to patronize those
who perceive Hindu to be a four-letter word?
(source:
Reclaiming
the Hindu Gods - By Swapan Dasgupta - telegraphindia.com
January 30' 2004).
Don't play
with Indian pride, PM warns author
Shivaji
is my ideal, says Vajpayee
In view of the controversy on James Laine's book on
Chhatrapati Shivaji, Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee today
warned the foreign author not to play with "our national
pride". On
the alleged remark against Shivaji and his mother Jijamata in
the book titled, 'Shivaji: Hindu King in Islamic India',
Vajpayee said, "we not only condemn it, but also warn the
foreign author not to play with our national pride."
(source:
Don't
play with Indian pride, PM warns author - sify.com
and
Shivaji
is my ideal, says Vajpayee - mid-day.com
March
20 2004).
"What
James Laine wrote in his book was false, absurd and
unforgivable," said Mr Bhonsle.
"I
don't blame Mr Laine. There are hardly any family values in the
west. What James Laine wrote only reflects on his
upbringing."
(source:
Fighting
in the name of a legend - BBCnews.com).
(Note:
Perhaps Prof. James Laine should consider writing a book on
American cultural icon such as Thomas
Jefferson and his relationship with black slave Sally Hemings).
India
seeks to arrest US scholar
Indian
officials have decided to seek the arrest of an American scholar
who has written a controversial biography of a historic national
figure. James Laine, who teaches religious studies at a US
university, has written a book on Shivaji, a 17th Century
warrior venerated in western India. The
Congress government of the western state of Maharashtra said it
would seek the assistance of Interpol to arrest him.
It says the book smears Shivaji's image, and is insulting to
India. Maharashtra Home Minister R R Patil said that a
"criminal offence has been registered against"
Professor Laine, who teaches religious studies at Macalester
College in Minnesota.
(source:
India
seeks to arrest US scholar - BBC.com).
The
Sambhaji Brigade which was accused in the attack is not a
Hindutva group but a Maratha (ethnic) group opposed to BJP and
Hindu Brahmins, and their vandalism of priceless Sanskrit
manuscripts cannot be portrayed as a “Hindu” act.
This was recently explained to me by Maharashtrians who classify
themselves as leftists, and who saw the book as a distortion of
Maratha's secular history. So the Post
is blatantly wrong in insisting on a narrative of Hinduism
causing vandalism, and also in claiming that Hindus
consider Shivaji's parents to be divine.
(source:
Washington
Post and Hinduphobia
- By Rajiv Malhotra - sulekha.com).For
interesting article refer to Prof.
Courtright's Pseudo-psychoanalytic Depiction of Shri
Ganesha:
Authentic
Scholarship or Bigotry? -
By
Shree S. Vinekar, MD and
Concerned
Community and Animal
House: The South Asian Religious Studies Circus and
Protestant
Pedagogues Peeved at Protest Against Porn-Peddling - By
Narayanan Komerath
- indiacause.com).
(Note:
Perhaps Prof. James Laine should consider writing a book on
American cultural icon such as Thomas
Jefferson and his relationship with black slave Sally Hemings).
Top
of Page
Tasteless diatribe against a hero
– By Sandhya Jain
Demeaning
Shivaji, denigrating dharma
Having
purchased and read James Laine's Shivaji: Hindu King in Islamic
India only after it was officially withdrawn by the publishers,
I cannot view the events at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research
Institute (BORI) as totally unjustified. Certainly, attacks on
centres of learning have no place in Hindu ethos and must not
recur. Yet, having gone through 105 pages of shoddy polemics
posing as historical research, I am constrained to state that
Oxford University Press needs to re-examine its commissioning
policy if it hopes to retain credibility as a publishing house.
Reading
the book, I was struck by the fact that it did not once mention
Shivaji's famed ambition to establish a Hindu Pad Padshahi. This
is a strange omission in a work claiming to study how
contemporary authors viewed Shivaji's historic role, and the
assessment of his legacy by subsequent native and colonial
writers. The most notable omission is of the poet Bhushan, who
wrote: "Kasihki Kala Gayee, Mathura Masid Bhaee; Gar
Shivaji Na Hoto, To Sunati Hot Sabaki!" [Kashi has lost its
splendour, Mathura has become a mosque; If Shivaji had not been,
All would have been circumcised (converted)].
Bhushan's
verse has immense historical value because the Kashi Vishwanath
temple was razed in 1669 and thus lost its splendour, and the
Krishna Janmabhoomi temple was destroyed and converted into a
mosque in 1670. Bhushan came to Shivaji's kingdom from the
Mughal capital in 1671, and within two years composed Shiv
Bhooshan, a biography of Shivaji. It clearly states that Shivaji
wanted to set up a Hindu Pad Padshahi.
Shivaji strove consciously for
political power as an instrument for the resurrection of dharma
(righteousness), a quest he termed as "Hindavi Swarajya,"
a word having both geographical and spiritual-cultural
connotations. When still in his teens in 1645 CE,
Shivaji began administering his father's estate under a
personalized seal of authority in Sanskrit, an indication that
he envisaged independence and respected the Hindu tradition. A
1646 CE letter to Dadaji Naras Prabhu refers to an oath that
Shivaji, Prabhu, and others took in the presence of the deity at
Rayareshwar, to establish "Hindavi Swarajya."

Ramdas
was one of the greatest saints of the world. He was the inspirer
of Shivaji. Like the Sanskrit Gita and the Tamil Kurul, the
Dasabodha is one of the greatest classics of world literature.
Ramdas was a contemporary of Sant Tukaram. As makers of
Maharastra and remakers of Hindustan, Ramdas and Shivaji will
always go together as one ideological complex in the historical
scholarship of future generations.
(image source: Creative India - By Benoy
Kumar Sarkar p. 399-400).
***
The
insinuation about "bigot" is especially objectionable
in view of Laine's insistence that Shivaji had no particular
interest in Hindu civilization and no proven relationship with
the revered Samarth Ramdas
or Sant
Tukaram. What the reader
needs to understand is that Ramdas' historical significance lies
in the fact that he openly exhorted the people to rise against oppression and hinted
in Dasbodh that Shivaji was an avatar who had come to restore
dharma. By denying that he was Shivaji's spiritual mentor, Laine
seeks to disprove that the great Maratha wanted to establish a
Hindu Pad Padshahi.
Then, there is Laine's tasteless
allegation that Shivaji may possibly (whatever that means) be
illegitimate, simply because Jijabai, who bore
many children while living with her husband in the south, gave
birth to Shivaji on her husband's estate near Pune and continued
to live there. Maharashtrians point out that Shahaji had to send
his pregnant wife to safety in Shivneri due to political
instability. Shahaji was on the run with the boy king Murtaza
Nizamshah, in whose name he controlled the
Nizamshahi. After its fall in 1636, service in the Adilshahi
took him to Bangalore (his remarriage produced the distinguished
Thanjavur-Bhonsle dynasty); he administered his Pune lands
through Dadaji Konddev.
(source:
Tasteless diatribe against a hero
– By Sandhya Jain -
dailypioneer.com - January 27 2004).
***
"Intellectual
engagement is the aspect of Hinduism. Banning books is not in
the Dharmic tradition" - Yvette C. Rosser
It is wrong to ban books, says Prime
Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee
Referring
to the Maharashtra government ban on a book on Chhatrapati
Shivaji by American author James Laine, Vajpayee said it was
wrong to ban books. The state government banned Laine's book:
Shivaji: A Hindu King in Islamic India, after members of the
Sambhaji Brigade (a Maratha organisation) recently damaged
important documents and monuments at Pune's Bhandarkar Oriental
Research Institute (BORI) while staging a protest against the
book. The attackers said the book contains derogatory remarks
about Shivaji and Laine wrote the book after conducting primary
research at BORI. The police arrested 72 members of the Brigade
for vandalising the BORI office).
(source:
It
is wrong to ban books, says Vajpayee -
hindustantimes.com).
Pune
police book American writer Laine
-
The Deccan police on Friday booked American writer
James William Laine, author of Shivaji — Hindu King in Islamic
India, for allegedly writing contentious material against
Chattrapati Shivaji with an intent to cause a riot. The publisher and printer of
the Oxford University Press have also been booked. According to
the police, Laine will be arrested and his passport seized if he
returns to the country. Laine has written contentious material on page No 93 of
the book against Shivaji and his mother, Jijabai. The complainant has claimed that since the matter
printed in the book is provocative, the feelings of many
followers of Shivaji have been hurt. The police have registered
a case under Section 153 of the Indian Penal Code, which stands
for: wantonly giving provocation with intent to cause a riot,
and under 153(A), which is for promoting enmity between
different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth,
residence, language, etc, and doing acts prejudicial to
maintenance of harmony.
(source: Pune
police book American writer Laine -
timesofindia.com and
Maharashtra
Congress
Govt
bans US author's book on Shivaji -
indianexpress.com).
Union HRD Minister Murli
Manohar Joshi has slammed the book and said: ‘‘Such
references, based on no evidence nor facts, need to be strongly
repudiated by our intellectuals. There ought to be a probe to
find out motive behind the same,’’ Joshi told reporters. He
described the attack on BORI as an onslaught on the country’s
heritage of knowledge. ‘‘The
book may have been withdrawn from the market but 10-20 years
ahead if it continues to exist, it will get the status of
reference material. Laine’s references need to be strongly
repudiated at intellectual and academic level.’’
(source:
For
Joshi, siege bad but Laine’s remarks worse -
indianexpress.com).
Feedback to
Editor of Indian Express
Who is
Laine? what are his credentials? How many books has he written?
There are people who have spend their entire life on studying
Shivaji and still do not call themselves scholar. The
Indian media and press are real hypocrites and whiners who only
support anti Hindu tirades. Why don't
they do the same when a Muslim
or Christian book is banned? They just keep their
oily mouths shut for fear of rousing the minority rabble. This
is the main reason for rising Hindu anger against false
secularists because in India secularism means HINDU BASHING and
hurting the feelings of Hindus. Can you imagine if such a thing
were done to Muslims or any other religion? The Hindu patience
is finally running out and false secularists had better get out
of India and do their stuff elsewhere. Tolerance does NOT mean
Hindu bashing. If
banning this book on Shivaji is wrong, where were the
secularists when the Satanic
Verses furor took place? The so
called liberal communists recently banned a Bangladesh writers Tasleema's
book because it hurts Muslim sentiment. No outrage from liberal
writers, painters, Secularists and the so called National moral
bearers National Press.
Anyone who has lived
for long in US/WEST & the author of the book is from there,
knows what is the meaning of marriage in US/WEST!! It amazes me
that people from a land where MOST don't know who their mother
or father is anymore write about our solid family traditions
(that includes Shivaji) & it is the same people who dropped
atomic bomb on Japan who have the audacity to question our
Nuclear program & these same people who enslaved blacks for
centuries & still treat all minorities including
Hindus/Indians as lowly beings lecture us on so-called human
rights & civil rights!! They do so as they know the
slavishness of most Hindus for white skin...Shivaji
Maharaj was the first ruler to propagate the Swaraj theme and
one of the earliest kings to instill a democratic setup in daily
governance.
(source: Letters
to the Editor - indianexpress.com).
Top
of Page
Banning books
and Double Standards?
Hypocrisy
that is Nehruvian Secularism
Marxist Historians (R.
S. Sharma, R. C. Thakran, Suraj Bhan, Irfan Habib, D.N. Jha,
Shireen Moosvi and K. M. Shrimali) today joined the chorus of
protests within the academic community against the vandalism at
the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute (BORI) in Pune
earlier this month. In a statement issued here under the banner
of the Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust (SAHMAT), they described the
Maharashtra Government's ban on the American Indologist, James
Laine's book as ``totally unwarranted''. They said:
"It
is quite clear that our cultural heritage is not safe with the
fundamentalist forces having a free run in the country. They are
being actively encouraged by the ideology that preaches
intolerance and has no respect for half-a-millennium-old
monuments, contemporary art practices and scholarly
pursuits.''
The
West Bengal government's ban on Taslima
Nasreen's book because it offended some Muslims is not the
"appeasement of communal and fascist elements" but is
well within the "centuries-old tradition in India of social
and intellectual tolerance" and, therefore, needs no
protest.
And
the disrespect to and Freudian innuendo over divinities
(refer to RISA
Lila - 2 - Limp Scholarship and Demonology - By Rajiv
Malhotra and chapter on
Glimpses IX)
sacred to the majority in
our country is "scholarly pursuits" and, therefore,
needs no protest. These scholars - and artists - wouldn't
dare apply the same manner of interpretation or depiction to,
say, the Islamic god and his prophet. (Satanic
Verses by Salman Rushie
was banned by Congress PM Rajiv Gandhi in India). But that is their academic
freedom, isn't it?
Eric
Hoffer describes fanaticism as a "malady of the soul of the
world" and identifies it as "a Judaic-Christian
invention" ("The True Believer", NY: Harper
Perennial, 1989:168).
No,
I do not condone the BORI vandalism. But I invite you to read
Shylock's speech in The Merchant of Venice III.i - the one that
has "...if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?.....The
villainy you teach me, I will execute...".

"Intellectual
engagement an important aspect of Hinduism. Banning books is not in
the Dharmic tradition"
***
All
through recorded history, which are the ideologies characterized
by the fanatic destruction of the others' "national
consciousness incarnated in books" (http://www.harvardmag.com/on-line/110388.html)
- the firing of the Alexandria library,
the burning of non-Muslim scriptures, the sack of Nalanda
university, the incineration of the Aztec and Maya codices, the
literary holocaust of 100 million books in Nazi-occupied Europe,
the Serbian bombing of the Bosnian national library, and the
ransacking of the Baghdad museum are only some examples of
biblioclasm from hundreds, if not thousands, of examples of the
destruction by these ideologies of the cultural resources of
others.
It
is to these very ideologies that these scholars and historians
belong, or that they consider "secular". That these
ideologies not only have openly declared their intention to wipe
out the world's last major paganism but are actively and
successfully engaged in doing so, therefore, needs no protest,
because to these scholars and historians it is these ideologies
that are "sane".
We
pagans, by implication, are "insane". Whose history, therefore, is to sit in judgement?
(source:
Historians
protest ban on book -
hindu.com
and History
will judge - vigilonline.com).
Lane's
serious miscalculation
Mr.
Lane saw the Shivaji legend from his simpleton
Western mind (George Bush: Good and Saddam Hussein:
Evil) in terms of the Left-Hindutva divide. If only reality was
as simple as his two dimensional imagination! For example see
the confusion created by the Frontline story by Anupama Katakam.
A well know leftist commentator
Dilip Chitre laments about the "Talibanization" of
Maharashtra while neglecting to mention the role of the NCP-Congress
(not the Shiv Sena-BJP) government in it. "As
he says in the article, "The owners of Shivaji's story had
their own set of questions, delivered with a punch: who should
be allowed to portray this history? Should an outsider working
with Brahmin English-speaking elites have a greater say in
Shivaji's story than Shivaji's own community?" Once again
Mr. Laine has created a false dichotomy. Shivaji
is a venerated figure in all sections of Hindus in and out of
Maharashtra. I cannot believe he is unaware of Samartha
Ramdas,
Veer Savarkar, and Tilak's rich tributes to Shivaji Maharaj.
Why does he think the "elite English speaking Brahmin
community" has a dramatically different view of Shivaji? He
is probably basing it on a poor joke from an unnamed source.
(source:
Yahoo
Groups - Indian Civilization).
***
Examples
of book banning in
the West
In 1930, U.S. Customs seized Harvard-bound copies of Candide,
Voltaire's critically
hailed satire, claiming obscenity. Two Harvard professors
defended the work, and it was later admitted in a different
edition. In 1944, the US Post Office demanded the omission of
Candide
from a mailed Concord Books catalog. Thomas Paine, best
known for his writings supporting American independence, was
indicted for treason in England in 1792 for his work The Rights of Man, defending the
French Revolution. More than one English publisher was also
prosecuted for printing The
Age of Reason, where Paine
argues for Deism and against Christianity and Atheism. Senator
Joseph McCarthy had overseas libraries run by the United States
Information Service pull an anthology of American literature
from the shelves because it included Thoreau's
Civil
Disobedience). In Mark
Twain's lifetime, his books Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry
Finn were excluded from the
juvenile sections of the Brooklyn Public library (among other
libraries), and banned from the library in Concord, MA, home of
Henry Thoreau. Shakespeare's
The
Merchant of Venice was banned
from classrooms in Midland, Michigan in 1980, due to its
portrayal of the Jewish character Shylock. The
Bible
and The
Quran were both removed from numerous libraries and banned
from import in the Soviet Union from 1926 to 1956. Harry
Potter books were burned in a bonfire by Rev.George
Bender, leader of the Harvest Assembly of God Church near
Pittsburgh.
(source: Banned
Books Online).
Top
of Page
US offers
freedom but robs your soul, says NRI (Non-Resident Indian)
The U.S. offers many opportunities for freedom and wealth but
robs people's souls, a top Indian American banker told hundreds
of his community members here, urging them to invest in values
rather than money.
"The
U.S. offers unbounded opportunities in terms of freedom and
money. In return it robs you of your soul," said Victor
Menezes, senior vice chairman of Citigroup. Menezes was speaking
at the annual banquet of the Indo American Centre, a non profit
community service organisation that serves immigrants from the
South Asian community in Chicago. Around 500 people attended the
event.

Gangotri is a
small village located in the far northern area of Uttar Pradesh.
This town is the inhabited center closest to the source of the
Sacred River - the Ganga.
(source: India
- By Adrian Mayer).
***
"Invest
in your family, in achievements, not money and live below your
means," he urged the business leaders and community members
at the banquet. Speaking
on "Investment in the Community" Menezes highlighted
the importance of a close knit, caring family, which first
generation Indian Americans like him took for granted. "It
is a great advantage to have the support of Indian education and
values."
Menezes
said he found that Indian immigrants to several other places
like East Africa were able to maintain their heritage and
culture after several generations. But this was much harder to
do in the U.S., making it "a lot more challenging to be a
success as a second generation Indian American". The three
challenges for Indian Americans were to "maintain
our roots, link to the community, and preserve our family
structure,"
Menezes said.
(source: US
offers freedom but robs your soul, says NRI -
hindustantimes.com Indo
Asian News Service Chicago, September 29 2003).
Top
of Page
Hinduism: Most
suited religion for the spirit of Democracy
"The
problem with the BJP is not that it is Hindu; but that it is NOT
Hindu. I would happily cheer for a Hindu party because, apart
from Buddhism,
I have found no religion as appealing to the intellect, as
satisfying to the soul and as accommodative of differences as
Hinduism.
I can also think of no religion more suited to the spirit
of democracy.
In the West, democracy developed in conflict with - and despite
- the Church. In India, democracy took root in the fertile soil
of Hinduism.
Most of us think the British introduced democracy and Gandhi,
Nehru and a handful of others made it stick, against impossible
odds. Thus, you hear about the 'miracle" of Indian
democracy. This is wrong thinking - Gandhi was a great man, but
his greatness is only next to that of the hundreds of millions
of Indians who took to him as their natural leader. It
is Indian culture that nurtures Indian democracy; and Indian
culture was shaped by Hindu thought. How could it be otherwise
when Hindus form over 80% of the population?
In my book, therefore, a Hindu party would be
one that would uphold Rajdharma,
not just pay lip service to it ("That king is
greatest," said Bhishma to Yudhishtir, "in whose
kingdom subjects wander as freely as children in their parental
home"); it would celebrate diversity, not be wary of it;
and it
would be inclusive, not exclusive.
Such a party would be a natural party of governance for
India."
(source: Why
BJP should be more Hindu - by Tony Joseph). For
more on Democracy in ancient India, refer to article - Democracy
and refer to chapter on Glimpses_VIII
and Polytheism
- Spiritual Democracy, refer to chapter on Glimpses_VI).
***
Why democracy didn't
take roots in Pakistan? - By Vinod Kumar
Democracy demands men make laws to govern themselves. It
is the acceptance of this premise that democracy has succeeded
in India and it is the rejection of this very premise that
democracy failed to take roots in Pakistan.
No society can live outside the parameters of its basic
ideology; and not only the ideology but the very raison d'ętre
of the existence of Pakistan is Islam. Though
India is not a religious Hindu state but Hinduism is still the
soul of India and still guides the way India thinks and acts.
It is the basic difference in these ideologies that has made
democracy a failure in one and success in another even though in
all other respects both countries are twins. It is when religion
comes into play, the two part company. To the contrary, in
Hinduism, the individual is the most important factor.
Each individual is urged to search the truth for himself -- even
the authority of the Vedas -- the highest regarded scriptures of
the Hindus -- is not to be accepted if it does not pass
individuals' search or interpretation of the truth. With
the concept of multiple manifestation of Hindu gods, diversity
is the norm rather than the rule. I will not be far
off if I were to say, in Hinduism each individual creates his
own god or at least worships the god of one's own choosing.
Hindu scriptures are man made and evolve with time.
The
day Hinduism becomes a minority religion in India, it will be no
different from Pakistan.
(source:
Why
democracy didn't take roots in Pakistan? - By Vinod Kumar
- kashmirherald.com).
Top
of Page
Indians
should not ape US, says Mark Tully
“India
should retain its individuality, culture and tradition and at
the same time should have power to overcome the sweeping changes
blowing across the country", Tully added.
"It's
upon the people to decide whether they want the country to
remain `asli Bharat' or `nakli America'. `Asli Bharat' is
better," he remarked.
Mr. Tully was speaking after
inaugurating a book exhibition on India at the British Library.
Recalling his long association with India, he said the country
and its people always treated him good and he never felt as an
outsider. "I have been in India for 40 years and I never
felt I was at a disadvantage and it's a tribute to the
generosity of the people here," he said, referring to the
circumstances like the British rule and the Independence
movement. "Indian tradition has been that it welcomes
everyone into its fold."
(source: Indians
should not ape US, says Mark Tully - hindu.com
and hindu.com).
Top
of Page
Hindu Empire at Hampi Declared a World
Heritage Centre
Recently
declared by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization (UNESCO) as a World Heritage Centre, a
visit to Hampi in the state of Karnataka will reveal a glorious
ancient Hindu empire. Home to the Vijayanagar empire that was
established by two disciples of saint Vidyaranya in 1336 and
reigned until its destruction by Islamic invaders in 1565, the
area exemplifies Indian culture, Hindu temples, art and
architecture.

Hampi was the
capital of the Vijayanagar empire and visiting the
30-square-kilometer area will transport visitors to a golden era
of Hindu culture.
***
At
the height of the empire between 1509 and 1529, the kingdom
covered the entire present day States of Karnataka, Andhra
Pradesh and Maharashtra. Hampi was the
capital of the Vijayanagar empire and visiting the
30-square-kilometer area will transport visitors to a golden era
of Hindu culture. Even though the Islamic invaders
tried to destroy the city for six months, many of the structures
remain today as architectural marvels. For example, the
Virupaksha temple still rises majestically displaying a 120-foot
tall tower at its eastern entrance. Inside shrines contain
murthis of Lord Siva and Goddesses Pampa and Bhuvaneswari. Another
magnificent monument, the Vithal temple complex, has 56 musical
pillars and a stone chariot with wheels that still turn.
The nearby Hazara Ramaswami temple was the private place of
worship for the royal family. Scenes from the Ramayana are
carved on two of the inside walls of this temple. Other ruins at
Hampi include the Lotus Mahal which is shaped like a lotus
flower on top, an elephant stable revealing Hindu-Muslim style
architecture, and a recent discovery, the Pushkarini tank, with
granite steps that connected the pond with a channel from the
nearby river. No empire would be
complete without Lord Ganesha and a 9-foot tall single stone
statue adorns the site. The Ministry of Tourism along
with the Central government are planning to have an interactive
computer in place to guide tourists about the historical sites
at Hampi. Presently Hampi can be reached by rail, car, taxi or
bus and it is recommended that visits occur between October and
March to avoid the extreme heat. Hampi also boasts several
boarding and lodging facilities.
(source: Hindu
Empire at Hampi Declared a World Heritage Centre -
Hinduism Today). For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
Top
of Page
Hindutva
is growing in relevance - By Babul Roy Mishra
Both Swami
Vivekananda and historian Arnold
Toynbee found Hindu resilience against the onslaught of
Islam and Christianity extraordinary in the annals of
civilisations.
It was Hindus' fortress of tolerance and a sense of equanimity
that no outside conquerors could penetrate, and this
distinguishes the Hindus from others. Both pointed out, though
in different context, that the Hindu India stood out as the only
country which, despite Islamic rule for six centuries, had not
turned into Dar-ul Islam, and despite British rule for next two
centuries had not turned into a predominantly Christian country.
Some intellectuals distinguish the term Hindutva
from Hinduism, holding that the former being an aggressive cult
is clearly distinctive from traditionally non-aggressive
Hinduism. Hence, to them Hindutva is a distortion of Hinduism,
and is comparable with Islamic fundamentalism.
Even though the Supreme Court has not found any distinction
between the above two terms etymologically.
In the first place,
it is wrong to think that the concept of Hindutva is a recent
phenomenon. On the contrary,
such aggressive face of the Hindus did surface whenever they
faced an attack to their core identity, to preserve which they
have taken to uncharacteristic regimentation and stringent
rituals Under the Islamic rule and again during the British, we
found resurgence of the same aggressive Hindutva, holding out a
protective barrier to prevent penetration that could shake off
their very identity. The Hindus have never felt the
need to convert a person of another religion to their own. They
have never castigated a non-believer as an outcaste or a sinner.
On the other hand, they have recognised
atheists like Charvaka as a saint.
What has led to the resurgence of Hindutva in secular,
democratic India? In order to understand the essence of
Hinduism, we should refer to the following slokas in the Upanishads:
"Om purna madah, purna midam, purnat purna mudachyateh,
purnasva purna madaya purna mebabosishyate." Meaning,
"Whatever we see is purna, whatever is beyond is also purna;
from purna emanates purna; if we subtract purna from purna what
remains is purna." Thus the Hindu concept of God is purna
or the "all-pervasive whole". As in mathematics, zero
minus zero is zero, in Hindu philosophy, purna minus purna is
purna. Some describe this purna as "sunya" or zero. All
that exists is included in this purna or sunya or zero. Herein
lies the difference between the Hindu concept of God and God in
other religions. While other religions believe that God is one,
the Hindus say God is all-pervasive.
Hindu God exists in all
beings, in every atom or sub-atomic particle. Thus the Hindus
believe in identity of souls and develop equanimity or
same-sightedness. None is superior or inferior to a spiritual
Hindu. . It is possible, according to him, to realise God
within self. He also sees God in others. This explains the
multiplicity of gods in Hindu concept. Hindu philosophy teaches
us to respect one and all as God dwells in all.
As to the question, what has led to the
resurgence of Hindutva in present time, we often indulge in naivete
by attributing it to political motives.
Such abject vote politics has increasingly alienated Hindu
masses from those parties, as they were already provoked by
Partition on communal consideration followed by Kashmir
annexation. Cross-border terrorism, three Indo-Pak wars and
the lingering Ayodhya dispute even after the ASI findings have
proved incendiary for Hindu reaction.
Resurgence of Hindutva is a reaction to above factors since
Hindus have felt an identity crisis. Hindutva will play a greater role
in the coming elections unless the ground situation changes
altogether.
(source:
Hindutva
is growing in relevance - By Babul Roy Mishra -
dailypioneer.com Jaunary 8 2003).
Top
of Page
India at its
shining best - By M V Kamath
It may sound a little exaggerated
but nevertheless true that there are no other people on earth
who are more critical of their own country and more contemptuous
of their own culture than Indians. It
almost seems that their ruling passion is self-hatred. Indians,
especially educated Hindus, take special delight in despising
Hinduism and constantly running it down and, what is worse,
taking immense pleasure in doing so. At a time when
the rate of economic growth was hovering around at a measly 3
per cent, one benighted economist even
thought it appropriate to dismiss it as the 'Hindu Rate of
Growth'.
One could almost hear him smack
his lips as he derided the enterprising spirit of his countrymen
or the lack of it. But times are changing. As the NDA government
is now coming to the end of its term peoples' spirit is lifting.
A full-page advertisement in the local English papers said it
all. 'Our country is prospering. Our lives are changing. Our
tomorrow is promising. You've never had a better time to shine
brighter' said the text. But the ad said something more that is
significant. 'Across
India, you can feel a new radiance. The economy is
looking up. Industry is upbeat. We are on the threshold of
further progress. Prices are stable. Roads are being added.
Highways are being modernised...' And so it went. 'India
Shining' was how progress was summed up. And no truer
words were said. The truth is that we are at last coming out of
the shadow of colonialism under which we have lived for over
half-a century ever since Independence.

***
As
a people we had lost our self- confidence. For
years we had been accustomed to look to the white man for
guidance and sustenance. Now we are finally coming into our own.
But what is it that is so special
about India? Consider some of these facts: We have 18 major
languages. 1,600 'minor' languages, and dialects, society is
divided into over 6,400 castes and sub-castes, there are 52
major tribes and ethnic groups in our 28 States and yet we are
one united country. We
are the largest functioning democracy in the world. In the last
general elections, 619 million voters took part in choosing
their representatives and they number about 2.5 times the entire
population of the United States of America. We have
over 5,000 dailies, 16,000 weeklies and more than 6,000
fortnightlies in various languages. Not
many countries can boast of such total freedom of thought and
action. Our railway system covers over one lakh km
with 700 stations, with 11,000 freight and passenger trains
plying the country every day carrying over one million
passengers. More graduates come out of our colleges every year
than in any other country barring the United States. India's
turn-over now is 75,000 in Information Technology and two
million English-speaking graduates in a year. With the financial
support of barely $ 450 million, we have designed, developed,
fabricated and tested our own launch missiles, and 23 of our
satellites are now in orbit. One hundred major European,
American and Japanese companies have set up their research,
design and development laboratories in India during the last
five years. We have become the sixth largest manufacturer of
medium and heavy commercial vehicles in the world. Over 2.2
million of our buses and trucks travel the length and breadth of
our country.
(source:
India
at its shining best
- By M V Kamath - newstodaynet.com).
Top
of Page
The
withering of the Christian faith in Europe
Christianity
has boomed in the developing world, competing successfully with
Islam, deepening its influence and possibly finding its future
there. But Europe already seems more and more like a series of
tourist-trod monuments to Christianity's past.
Hardly a month
goes by when the pope does not publicly bemoan that fact,
beseeching Europeans to rediscover the faith. The secularization
of Europe, according to some political analysts, is one of the
forces pushing it apart from the United States, where religion
plays a potent role in politics and society, shaping many
Americans' views of the world.
Americans are widely regarded as more comfortable with notions
of good and evil, right and wrong, than Europeans, who often see
such views as reckless. In France, which is predominantly
Catholic but emphatically secular, about one in 20 people
attends a religious service every week, compared with about one
in three in the United States.
"What's interesting isn't that there are fewer people in
church," said the Rev. Jean François Bordarier of Lille,
in northern France, "but that there are any at all."
"In
Western Europe, we are hanging on by our fingernails,"
wrote the Rev. David Cornick, the general secretary of the
United Reformed Church in Britain, in the June-July edition of
Inside Out, a religious journal. "The
fact is that Europe is no longer Christian.
"Public schools throughout Western Europe have removed
crosses from walls. There
are many suggested reasons for Europe's drift, which happened
gradually, over decades, as the continent grew wealthier and
better educated. Many younger Europeans say they
feel that religion is irrelevant.
"There's Buddhism,
Hinduism,
New
Age spiritualism,
consumerism," Father Bianchi said. "With all these
competitors, it's harder for the church to sell."
(source:
Faith
Fades Where It Once Burned Strong
- New York Times
- October 13 2003).
As
church attendance has withered in Europe, senior Vatican
officials and Roman Catholic leaders recognize and look to the
developing world as fertile ground for conversions and growth, a
place where the faith takes firmer root than it does in Europe
or North America these days.
(source:
Where
Faith Grows, Fired by Pentecostalism - newyorktimes.com).
For more refer to chapter on Conversion).
Top
of Page
Go
watch India's finest war epic - 'LOC Kargil'
Once in a blue moon, maybe longer, there comes along a film
that has the inner strength and conviction and the power to
change our lives. "LOC" is one such rarity.

The story of what happened to our
soldiers in Kargil, when they combated Pakistani invaders and
pushed them back with superhuman force, could cover at least
seven or eight major motion pictures. They never will. Hindi
cinema shies away from history. J.P. Dutta can stare historical
facts straight into the eye. Just like those Pakistani bullets,
which hit Indian soldiers straight in their eyes, Dutta's film
is a sharp-shooting piece of art.
With each soldier's death, we the
audience die a thousand deaths. The film's
pain-lashed and choleric recreation of history assumes a
bludgeoning impact in the hands of the master creator. The guns
are real. And so are the tears that the soldiers and their wives
shed each time a colleague dies. We're apart from and yet a part
of the processes of history that drive two countries into
postures of mutual mutilation.
"LOC" must be seen by every
Indian, every fan of war epics and relevant cinema. It must be
seen for its extraordinary war scenes and for its emphatic
portrayal of the ravages of human aggression.
Finally, it must be watched to see how our stars transform
themselves given the right opportunity.
(source:
Go
watch India's finest war epic - 'LOC Kargil' -
yahoo.com). For more refer to Kargil
War 1999 and lockargil.com).
Top
of Page
The
Mother Principle
- By Balbir Punj
An
evangelist is Calcutta's mascot, even though more authentic
figures abound.
Naqvi
Bhaumik's is lavish in its adulation of Mother Teresa's
Missionaries of Charity for 'Indianisation of Christianity'.
Not
caring much for rationality and its precepts, it eulogises Pope
John Paul II's 50th 'miraculous' canonisation ceremony and his
concerted effort to repackage Christianity for Asia. All that
she says is completely true but not the complete truth. She does
not quote the chief pontiff's November 1999 call in New Delhi
for the "evangelisation of Asia in the 3rd millennium AD,
on the lines of Europe in the 1st and Americas in the 2nd".
Bhaumik's
contention that the spread of Christianity in India can't be
linked to the British also doesn't hold water. Elizabeth
Susan Alexander, in her The
Attitude of British Protestant Missionaries Towards Nationalism
in India, says: "The evangelical revival of
Christianity that swept Britain from the last decades of 18th
century changed the situation completely. The Company had to
cede entry rights to British missionaries in its controversial
Charter Act 1813, paving the way for intensive activities by
British Protestant missionaries."
Historian R. C. Mazumdar,
while dwelling on the pre-1857 period in his History
and Culture of Indian People, Vol. IX,
observes: "Some schools, mainly supported by the
government, were actually run by clergymen on a strictly
Christian basis. About the modus operandi of conversion through
these schools, it's sufficient to note that the pupils were
asked such questions as 'Who's your God?' and 'Who's your
redeemer?'. The inevitable reply, as a result of regular
coaching was, of course, Jesus Christ."
The Church uses
"miracles" to impress and draw innocents to its fold.
But why should the media, with claims to secularism and
rationality, glorify them?
I
can, in fact, give instances of three born Catholics—David
Frawley from the US, Koenrad Elst from Belgium and Francois
Gautier from France—who are truly immersed in this spirit of
Indophilia. These lovers of India are
working silently with no reward or hype, the kind which attends
the Teresa myth. Is it because they are enamoured with the soul
of India and thoroughly oppose evangelisation? Even
in Calcutta, leave alone India, never was she the only
philanthropist. One can, without reflection, name the
Ramakrishna Mission, Bharat Seva Ashram Sangha, Chinmaya
Mission, Satya Sai Baba Trust among the organisations engaged in
doing hands-on social work. But thanks
to figures like Malcolm Muggeridge and Dominique Lapierre, in
the western consciousness Calcutta is synonymous with Mother
Teresa.
What a tragedy this, for a city that is
regarded as the cultural capital of India! Calcutta has produced
many luminaries who could claim its brand ambassadorship better
than Mother Teresa—Raja Ram Mohun Roy, Swami Vivekananda,
Rabindranath Tagore, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, Sir J.C. Bose,
Nirad C. Chaudhuri and Satyajit Ray—to name a few.
Should
Calcutta be associated with them or Mother Teresa, who portrayed
the city as an overgrown slum?
Does the name Sister Nivedita, aka
Margaret Noble, ring a bell in the historical memory of Indians
fawning over Agnes Bojaxhiu, better known to them as Mother
Teresa?
Nobel, an Irish, belonged to a family of
Catholic priests. Her father Samuel Nobel had returned from
preaching in India and had told little Margaret: "India, my
little one, is seeking her destiny. She called me once and will
perhaps call you, too, some day. Always be ready for her
call." The national destiny that the priest was referring
to was perhaps no different from the one envisaged by Pope John
Paul II. Margaret did adhere to her father's word, but very
differently. Her meeting with Swami Vivekananda in 1895 in
Dublin had a strong impact on her. She came to Calcutta the
following year and the Swami consecrated her to the nation as
Nivedita (the dedicated one). Unlike Teresa, who spent 50 years
in this country, Nivedita mastered Bengali and Sanskrit. Braving
the hostilities of an orthodox Hindu society, she started her
first school for girls in 1898. When a plague epidemic broke out
in Calcutta in 1899, Nivedita set an example by cleaning the
roads and scavenging garbage around the clock. She had the
physical characteristics of a Celt, but the soul of an Indian. She
accompanied Vivekananda on his 1899 America tour, preaching
about India's rich contribution to world civilization and human
thought.
But the Church functions like a
multinational company for souls and continues to repackage
itself for target consumers. Adoption of Hindu symbols is a
similar acculturation strategy on its part. We, on our part,
have to decide on our role model: Mother Teresa or Sister
Nivedita?
(source:
The
Mother Principle
- By Balbir Punj - outlookindia.com - December 1,
2003.
For more refer to
Mother
Teresa, The Final Verdict - By Aroup Chatterjee and
Mother
Teresa: Beyond the Image - By Anne Sebba and The
Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice -
By Christopher Hitchens and West
Bengal Govt snubs Teresa celebrations - sify.com
and and A
saint vs a patriot - By Arvind Lavakare and
The
saint business - By Rajeev Srinivasan and Indians
Against Christian Aggression.
For more refer to chapter on Conversion.
Refer
to VINDICATED BY TIME: The Niyogi Committee Report On
Christian Missionary Activities -
Christianity
Missionary Activities Enquiry Committee 1956
and
The
Sunshine of Secularism.
Top
of Page
Silence
of the stones
Iconoclasm and Islamic invasion
A few days ago, I visited the Jama Masjid near the Qutub
Minar. The Persian epigraph over the eastern gateway reads:
"This fort was conquered and this Jami Masjid built in the
months of the year 587 by the Amir, the great, the glorious
commander of the Army, Qutb-ud-daula waddin, the Amir-ul-umara
Aibeg, the slave of the Sultan, may God strengthen his helpers.
The materials of 27 idol temples, on each of which 2,000,000
Deliwal had been spent were used in (the construction of) this
mosque. God the Great and Glorious may have mercy on that slave,
every one who is in favour of the good builder prays for this
faith" (Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica, 1911-12, p 13).
This is just the tip of the iceberg.
From the Arabic texts of AL Biladhuri in the second half of the
ninth century to Syed Mahmuldul Hasan's English works of the
1940s, there are 80 historical
treatises covering a period of 1,200 years full of Islamic
evidence of iconoclasm. In
the vast territory extending from Khorasan in the west to
Tripura in the east and Transoxania in the north to Tamil Nadu
in the south, Hindu temples had been destroyed at 154 places by
61 kings, 63 military commanders and 14 Sufis. In most cases,
the temple materials were used to construct mosques, madarsas
and khanq-a-hs.

It
is a sad story, but many Hindus are not even conscious of this
assault on their civilisation. We suffer from compulsive amnesia
conflated with a pernicious brand of historical negativism.
(image source: Indian
Art - By Vidya Dehejia p. 249).
Watch
History
of Ayodhya - videogoogle.com.
***
It
is a sad story, but many Hindus are not even conscious of this
assault on their civilisation. We suffer from compulsive amnesia
conflated with a pernicious brand of historical negativism. All
nations that achieved greatness have a sense of history. We have
none.
Indifference
is the danger. We have suffered in silence for a millennium all
the cruelties of alien invaders who crossed over the Hindu Kush
to kill and ravage and despoil our sacred land in every possible
way. They slaughtered and they plundered; they desecrated our
revered shrines; and they trampled upon our sacred gods. Our
people were sold in slave markets, and we were subjugated.
Indignities were heaped on a proud people. Every shrine
desecrated is a crime against humanity. Just count the legions
of our temples and idols broken and defiled, whose debris lies
scattered all over India.
These
stones are not silent, even if they do not cry out. They softly
communicate their anguish by narrating the tale of a savage
desecration. Their whispers recall the shrines that once stood,
the idols that were once worshipped, the kings who once knelt
within them in prayer, the sages and seers who once preached and
the heroes who once fell defending the honour of their religion.

These stones bear a
testimony that is stronger than any evidence that can ever be
produced in any court of law in the world.
Watch
History
of Ayodhya - videogoogle.com.
***
These
stones bear a testimony that is stronger than any evidence that
can ever be produced in any court of law in the world. They hold
out to us the flame of our past heritage and glory, demanding
that we carry it forward, bequeathing the light to the
generations yet to come. Are we to be found wanting?
Every
year, Muslims commemorate Hazrat Imam Hussain who perished in
the battle of Kar-bala on Muharram, mourning his death with vows
to avenge it.
Do
Hindus engage in similar commemorative mourning for their dead
heroes, the holocaust their ancestors suffered and destruction
of their holy places, pledging never to let it happen again? No,
but it is time they did. A people who deny the past wrongs done
to them and forget the humiliation they have suffered are not
worth their salt. Our answer to the pseudo-secularists and all
those in denial should be that Hindus will never be trampled
upon again.
(source: Silence of the stones - B N
Sharma - dailypioneer.com - December 7 2003). For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
Top
of Page
What
the Islamic invaders really did - By Rizwan Salim
Savages
at a very low level of civilization and no culture worth the
name, from Arabia and west Asia, began entering India from the
early century onwards. Islamic invaders demolished countless
Hindu temples, shattered uncountable sculpture and idols,
plundered innumerable palaces and forts of Hindu kings, killed
vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu women. This
story, the educated-and a lot of even the illiterate
Indians-know very well. History books tell it in remarkable
detail. But many Indians do not seem to
recognize that the alien
Muslim marauders destroyed the historical evolution of the
earth's most mentally advanced civilization, the most richly
imaginative culture, and the most vigorously creative society.
It
is clear that India at the time when Muslim invaders turned
towards it (8 to 11th century) was the earth's richest region
for its wealth in precious and semi-precious stones, gold and
silver, religion and culture, and its fine arts and letters.
Tenth century Hindustan was also too far advanced than its
contemporaries in the East and the West for its achievements in
the realms of speculative philosophy and scientific theorizing,
mathematics and knowledge of nature's workings. Hindus of the
early medieval period were unquestionably superior in more
things than the Chinese, the Persians (including the Sassanians),
the Romans and the Byzantines of the immediate proceeding
centuries. The followers of Siva and Vishnu on this subcontinent
had created for themselves a society more mentally
evolved-joyous and prosperous too-than had been realized by the
Jews, Christians, and Muslim monotheists of the time. Medieval
India, until the Islamic invaders destroyed it, was history's
most richly imaginative culture and one of the five most
advanced civilizations of all times.
Look
at the Hindu art that Muslim iconoclasts severely damaged or
destroyed. Ancient Hindu sculpture is vigorous and sensual in
the highest degree-more fascinating than human figural art
created anywhere else on earth. (Only statues created by
classical Greek artists are in the same class as Hindu temple
sculpture). Ancient Hindu temple architecture is the most
awe-inspiring, ornate and spell-binding architectural style
found anywhere in the world. (The Gothic art of cathedrals in
France is the only other religious architecture that is
comparable with the intricate architecture of Hindu temples). No
artist of any historical civilization have ever revealed the
same genius as ancient Hindustan's artists and artisans.
Their
minds filled with venom against the idol-worshippers of
Hindustan, the Muslims destroyed a large number of ancient Hindu
temples. This is a historical fact, mentioned by Muslim
chroniclers and others of the time. A number of temples were
merely damaged and remained standing. But a large number - not
hundreds but many thousands - of the ancient temples were broken
into shreds of cracked stone. In the
ancient cities of Varanasi and Mathura, Ujjain and Maheshwar,
Jwalamukhi and Dwarka, not one temple survives whole and intact
from the ancient times.

In
the ancient cities of Varanasi and Mathura, Ujjain and Maheshwar,
Jwalamukhi and Dwarka, not one temple survives whole and intact
from the ancient times. Stones and columns of Hindu temples
were incorporated
into the architecture of several mosques.
Watch History
of Ayodhya - videogoogle.com.
***
It
is easy to conclude that virtually every Hindu temple built in
the ancient times is a perfect work of art. The evidence of the
ferocity with which the Muslim invaders must have struck at the
sculptures of gods and goddesses, demons and apsaras, kings and
queens, dancers and musicians is frightful. At so many ancient
temples of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, for example, shattered
portions of stone images still lie scattered in the temple
courtyards. Considering the fury used on the idols and
sculptures, the stone-breaking axe must have been applied to
thousands upon thousands of images of hypnotic beauty.
Giving proof of the
resentment that men belonging to an inferior civilization feel
upon encountering a superior civilization of individuals with a
more refined culture, Islamic invaders from Arabia and western
Asia broke and burned everything beautiful they came across in
Hindustan. So morally degenerate were the Muslim Sultans that,
rather than attract Hindu "infidels" to Islam through
force of personal example and exhortation, they just built a
number of mosques at the sites of torn down temples-and
foolishly pretended they had triumphed over the minds and
culture of the Hindus.
I have seen stones and columns of Hindu temples incorporated
into the architecture of several mosques, including the Jama
Masjid and Ahmed Shah Masjid in Ahmedabad; the mosque in the
Uparkot fort of Junagadh (Gujarat) and in Vidisha (near Bhopal);
the Adhai Din Ka Jhonpra right next to the famous dargah in
Ajmer-and the currently controversial Bhojshala
"mosque" in Dhar (near Indore).
Hindu culture was at
its imaginative best and vigorously creative when the
severely-allergic-to-images Muslims entered Hindustan. Islamic
invaders did not just destroy countless temples and
constructions but also suppressed cultural and religious
practices; damaged the pristine vigor of Hindu religion,
prevented the intensification of Hindu culture, debilitating it
permanently, stopped the development of Hindu arts ended the
creative impulse in all realms of thought and action, damaged
the people's cultural pride, disrupted the transmission of
values and wisdom, cultural practices and tradition from one
generation to the next; destroyed the proper historical
evolution of Hindu kingdoms and society, affected severely the
acquisition of knowledge, research and reflection and violated
the moral basis of Hindu society. The Hindus suffered immense
psychic damage. The Muslims also plundered the wealth of the
Hindu kingdoms, impoverished the Hindu populace, and destroyed
the prosperity of Hindustan.
Gaze
in wonder at the Kailas Mandir in the Ellora caves and remember
that it is carved out of a solid stone hill, an effort that
(inscriptions say) took nearly 200 years. This is art as
devotion. The temple built by the Rashtrakuta kings (who also
built the colossal sculpture in the Elenhanta caves off Mumbai
harbour) gives proof of the ancient Hindus' religious fervor.
The
descendants of those who built the magnificent temples of
Bhojpur and Thanjavur, Konark and Kailas, invented mathematics
and brain surgery, created mindbody disciplines (yoga) of
astonishing power, and built mighty empires would almost
certainly have attained technological superiority over Europe.
It
is not just for "political reasons" that Hindus want
to build grand temples at the sites of the (wrecked) Babri
Masjid in Ayodhya, the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, and the
Mathura idgah. The efforts of religion-intoxicated and
politically active Hindus to rebuild the Ram Mandir, the Kashi
Vishwanath Mandir, and the Krishna Mandir are just three
episodes m a one-thousand year long Hindu struggle to reclaim
their culture and religion from alien invaders.
The
demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya on 6 December 1992 was
just one episode in the millennial struggle of the Hindus to
repossess their religion-centered culture and nation. Meanwhile,
hundreds of ancient Hindu temples forsaken all over Hindustan
await the reawakening of Hindu cultural pride to be repaired or
rebuilt and restored to their original, ancient glory.
(source: What
the invaders really did - By Rizwan Salim
-
hindustantimes.com - December 28, 1997).
For more refer to chapter on Islamic
Onslaught and Hindu
Art). For more on Rizwan Salim refer to chapter
on Quotes181_200
and Hindu Art).
Refer to
My
People, Uprooted: "A
Saga of the Hindus of Eastern Bengal"
- By Tathagata Roy. For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
Top
of Page
Under
the arc of desecration
The
complex is, for the last 800 years, popularly called "Adhai
din ka Jhopra" (the structure of two and a half days).
So called because the triple or the three temples were converted
originally into a masjid over two and a half days. After the
second battle of Tarain (1192 AD) in which Shahabuddin
Muhammad Ghori defeated and killed Prithviraj
Chauhan, the victor passed through Ajmer. He was so
awed by the temples that he wanted them destroyed and replaced
instantly. He asked Qutubuddin Aibak,
his slave general, to have the needful done in 60 hours' time so
that he could offer prayers in the new masjid on his way back.
The
Jhopra is the first in the series of temple desecrations
perpetrated by the foreign rulers of India. The
earlier atrocities were by Mahmud
Ghazni, who raided but did not stay back to rule. The
triple temples were so attractive that the desecraters chose to
retain all, or most of the pillars. There are 70 of them under
the three roofs, which meet and appear to be one integrated
whole. And there are other pillars beyond the covered edifice,
which looks like a pavilion in splendid stone.

Interior
profile of Triple temples at Ajmer - Vandalism:
Defaced statues outside temples.
Watch History
of Ayodhya - videogoogle.com.
***
The
pillars are some 25 feet high gorgeously carved either with the
exquisite designs up to a height of about 20 feet thereafter
with delicate figurines. Uncannily, there is not a
single figure whose face has not been cut off. Nowhere in Europe
does one see such acts of vandalism except what the vandals
themselves perpetrated under their kind Gaiseric in the wake of
conquering Rome in 455 AD. Hereafter the word vandal became a
synonym for wilful desecration and destruction. The figurines on
all the relics on display at Rajputana Museum as well as those
salvaged by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) duly locked
in the compound of the Jhopra have been systematically defaced.
Amongst the thousands of stone heads, not a single nose or an
eye can be found.
Mind
you, the ASI has done nothing to excavate or salvage anything in
the complex since Independence. With the passing of the
Protection of National Monument Act, 1951 all archaeological
activities have been frozen. The credit for the excavations goes
to general Alexander Cunningham
and Dr D R Bhandarkar in the
first half of the 20th century. The details are available in the
Rajasthan District Gazetteer, Ajmer, 1966. Muhammad Ghori
presumably offered prayers within the stipulated two and a half
days. Subsequently in about 1200 AD the Dhai din ka Jhopra was
completed with a well-carved facade which is best described in
the words of Furher in the Archaeological Survey Report for the
year 1893: "The whole of the
exterior is covered up with a network of tracery so finely and
delicately wrought that it can only be compared to a fine
lace."
Cunningham
described the exterior of the Jhopra even more eloquently:
"For
gorgeous prodigality of ornament, beautiful richness of tracery,
delicate sharpness of finish, laborious accuracy of workmanship,
endless variety of detail, all of which are due to the Hindu
masons, this building may justly vie with the noblest buildings
which the world has yet produced."
Such
then was the vandalism with which the sultanate in Delhi began.
As with the Ouwwatul Islam Masjid next to the Qutub Minar, which
was also built by Sultan Aibdk, so with Dhai din ka Jhopra at
Ajmer. Both are indelible specimen of
humiliation perpetrated by the victor upon the vanquished.
(source: Under
the arc of desecration - By Prafull Goradia -
hindu vivek kendra). For more refer to Hindu
Masjids).
For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
Top
of Page
The
Indian Elite: the Western clones – By Francois Gautier
When they took over India, the British set upon establishing
an intermediary race of Indians, whom they could entrust with
their work at the middle level echelons and who could one day be
convenient instruments to rule by proxy, or semi-proxy. The tool
to shape these “British clones”
was education. In the words of Macaulay,
the “pope” of British schooling in India: “We must at
present do our best to form a class, who may be interpreters
between us and the millions we govern, a class of persons,
Indians in blood and color, but English in taste, in opinions,
in morals and in intellect.” Macaulay had very little regard
for Hindu culture and education: “all the historical
information which can be collected from all the books which have
been written in the Sanskrit language, is less valuable than
what may be found in the most paltry abridgment used at
preparatory schools in England.” Or: “Hindus have a
literature of small intrinsic value, hardly reconcilable with
morality, full of monstrous superstitions..”
It is the Brown Sahibs,
who upon getting independence, have denied India its true
identity and borrowed blindly from the British education system,
without trying to adapt it to the unique Indian mentality and
psychology; and it is they who are refusing to accept a change
of India’s educational system, which is totally
western-oriented..
And what India is getting from this education is a youth that
apes the West: they go to Macdonald’s, thrive on MTV culture,
wear the latest Klein jeans and Lacoste T-shirts, and in general
are useless, rich parasites, in a country which has so many
talented youngsters who live in poverty. They
will grow up like millions of other western clones in the
developing world, who wear a tie, read the New York Times and
swear by liberalism and secularism to save their countries from
doom. In time, they will reach elevated positions and
write books and articles which make fun of India, they
will preside over human-rights committees, be “secular” high
bureaucrats who take the wrong decisions and generally do
tremendous harm to India, because it has been
programmed in the genes to always run down their own country. In
a gist, they will be the ones who are always looking at the West
for approval and forever perceive India through the western
prism.
(source:
Arise
Again, O'India – By Francois Gautier - p. 65 - 66 Har
Anand publisher ISBN: 81-241-0518-9).
For refer to chapter on FirstIndologists,
European
Imperialism, Education
in Ancient India and Quotes221_250.htm).
Shakespeare
not Kalidasa ?
We
must know our roots -
The Blind imitation of the West
As
the young girls - from class one to six - in their blue uniforms
and pony tails stood and chanted the texts, I sat wondering
about the osmosis of culture. Here
was a British school in London, with English children reciting
lines written thousands of years ago by Indian sages on the
banks of the Indus and the Ganga, to an audience more familiar
with the latest Harry Potter film than with the intricacies of
Hindu metaphysics.
And yet, there was a palpable sense of achievement on the faces
of the children, and both pride and interest in the demeanour of
the parents and teachers. The recitation was competent and
enthusiastic, even if occasionally the accent was inescapably -
and understandably - foreign.
Sanskrit
is a near forgotten language in India. Most children I know
in upmarket schools consider learning it an imposition, if they
learn it at all. The
blind imitation of the cultural attributes of another people
leads only to caricature. That
was—and is—the fate of the brown sahibs of India. You
can only learn authentically of another culture when you have a
standing in your own.
The
tragedy in India is that so many of those who have been educated
in the English language know a great deal about Shakespeare and
Dickens, but almost nothing about Kalidasa or Agyeya, or about
the literary giants in their own mother tongue.
(source:
We
must know our roots - By Pavan K Varma -
hindustantimes.com). For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
Top
of Page
Nehru:
The Last Englishman in India?
Jawaharlal Nehru was the perfect replica of a certain kind of
Englishman, courteous, elegant, with a hint of affectation. He
often employed the expression “continental people,” in
speaking of the French or the Italians, with benevolent and
amused superiority. He despised
non-anglicized Indians and had but a very superficial
and restricted acquaintance with Indian culture, acquired solely
through works in the English language. He spoke Hindi and Urdu
badly, somewhat like a British non-commissioned officer. By
taste and habit, Nehru was a Westerner,
a layman who refused to consider himself a Hindu and who
rejected all the values of traditional society.
Nehru’s outlook was essentially that of a democratic
socialist of the 1930’s, but he rejected Gandhi’s belief in
village democracies loosely knit in a non-industrial society
because he believed that the introduction of modern mechanized
industry was the only way by which eliminating poverty could be
done.
(source: A
Brief History of India - By Alain Danielou p. 328).
Surviving
Nehru?
Nehru had
the name of a Hindu, the face of a socialist, the head of an
Englishman and the heart of a Muslim. For each of his facets,
India has had to pay a price.
The British in him made him select the Government of India
Act, 1935, as the skeleton around which to build the body of the
Constitution. This law had been enacted by the British to govern
the Indian colony more effectively. It was certainly not
conceived to make independent India blossom. The borrowed model
was the unwritten British constitution-unitary, non-federal,
monarchical, and Anglican rather than
secular. On all these grounds, it was an unsuitable model.
Is it any wonder the
number of times the Constitution has been amended in 53 years of
its life? The Japanese document, introduced at about the same
time, has undergone only one amendment. The US Constitution,
inaugurated way back in 1787, has been amended only 27 times.
Look how much progress America has made in the two centuries of
its independence. Look at how Japan progressed. The socialist
Nehru handed over Tibet on a
platter to Mao's China on the morrow of the communist
revolution. He not only forgot India's national interest but
also overlooked the rights of the Tibetans. Soon after, he
launched Panchsheel and Hindi-Chini bhai bhai. These mistakes,
begun in 1949, still defy correction. The present Government is
trying to induce Beijing to vacate at least part of the 28,000
square kms of occupied Indian territory. Nehru's weakness for
socialism also resulted in a public sector bias. Little did he
realise state ownership of industry would be tantamount to state
capitalism, not socialism.
The consequences of
Nehru's Muslim bias have been worse. By conceding the Muslim
League's demand for partition, he accepted Jinnah's two-nation
theory. He gave the League a Muslim Pakistan but imposed on
Hindustan an India with special privileges for the Muslims.
(source:
Surviving
Nehru? - By Prafull Goradia -
dailypioneerc.om - November 30 2003).
Nehru struggled to discover the soul of India as no other
Indian public figure did; Gandhij’s struggle was of an
altogether different kind, though it was far more valiant. Nehru
did not know Sanskrit, or for that matter, any Indian language
well enough. He did not have a direct access to Indian tradition
even by way of folklore since Motilal Nehru had deliberately
Westernized himself and brought up Jawaharlal
in a manner appropriate to an English gentleman. He
was educated in Eton and Harrow. Nehru was essentially not a
deep thinker. To the extent he was interested in ideas, he was
familiar only with ideas current with Britain in his
impressionable years, Fabian socialism, for instance. He
approached India’s past, historical as well as spiritual,
through British scholars who inevitably saw India through their
culturally colored prisms.
His address to the convocation of the Aligarh Muslim
University on January 24, 1948, he said:
“I am proud of India, not only
because of her ancient magnificent heritage, but also because of
her remarkable capacity to add to it by keeping the doors and
windows of her mind and spirit open to fresh and invigorating
winds from distant lands…”
He was more than a deeply moral human being. He yearned for
spiritual light. He was particularly
drawn to Swami Vivekananda and the Ramakrishna Ashram.
It is known that he sought solace from Anandmai to whom Indira
Gandhi also turned. Once he visited Sri Aurobindo ashram and met
the Mother. Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, President of Indian Republic,
disclosed that in the last years of his life, Nehru
used to come to him frequently to listen to the Upanishads
which, as A
Discovery of India shows, always fascinated him.
(source: The
Hindu Phenomenon – By
Girilal Jain p. 91 - 101).
Legend
of the fall
If one had to single out one man responsible for all our
misfortunes, political, military and economic, the finger would
point at Nehru. Adored by the fawning masses, he led an
unsuspecting nation to its worst disasters. While national
boundaries were being drawn after India's vivisection, he
allowed Hindu majority areas to be gifted away to Pakistan: Thar
Parkar in Sindh, with an 80 per cent Hindu population, Lahore in
Punjab, Sylhet in Assam, Khulna in Bengal and the Chittagong
hill tracts with 90 per cent Hindus and Buddhists.
During
Partition riots, Nehru blinked at the massacre of millions of
Hindus without any threat of retributive justice, thanks to a
weak-kneed policy of non-violence and to sustain his brand of
secularism. He buckled under Master Tara Singh's
threat, transferring Sikhs and Hindus out of West Punjab to
safety. But in Bengal, he was fooled by Liaqat Ali Khan's phony
assurance and forced Hindus to stay back and face genocide. The Kashmir problem
would not have arisen had Nehru, overcoming his personal
hostility to Maharaja Hari Singh, accepted his offer of
accession to the Indian Union. He later rushed to the United Nations and ordered a ceasefire
before our troops could complete the task of liberating the
whole of Kashmir. The Delhi agreement of 1950 (on Article 370)
against Patel's insistence, came about due to Nehru's
cussedness.
Nehru also ceded Tibet to China by
conceding its claim of sovereignty and, worse, stymied debate in
the UN despite US backing for the Tibetan cause. This
led to the disappearance of a friendly buffer state against an
expansionist China. When Nehru was waffling in Parliament that
the Indo-Tibetan boundary was not demarcated, Balraj Madhok had
to remind him of the Treaty of Leh signed September 2, 1841,
between Maharaja Gulab Singh and the Tibet Government. Nehru was
flummoxed. During the Dalai Lama's flight from
Leh, he
genuflected to China, whetting its appetite for more territory.
His blind belief in Panchsheel led to the 1962 disaster, leaving
130,000 sq. kms of the national territory of Ladakh and the NEFA
in Chinese hands.
Nehru's stubborn faith in socialism froze individual
entrepreneurship and stunted economic growth.
Nehru's
stubborn faith in socialism froze individual entrepreneurship
and stunted economic growth. His 'secularism' meant
Hindu-baiting and pandering to Muslims, communists and the Arab
world. He exiled men of substance like Acharya
Kriplani, Jayaprakash Narayan, PD Tandon and SP
Mookerjee, and his pro-Soviet agenda straitjacketed
foreign policy-with disastrous results. Nehru
was a no-where man: Hindu by birth, Muslim at heart and English
in thought and deed, who neither understood Hinduism nor the
Indian idiom. His three-pronged
secularism-socialism-nonalignment agenda lies in a shambles. As
the embalmed body of Stalin was removed from the Red Square,
India, which suffered at Nehru's hands, should have the courage
to remove his name from all its memorials. He is the false god
we need to stop worshipping.
(source: Legend
of the fall - By B N Sharma - dailypioneer.com -
December 28 2003).
The
Nehruvian Penalty: 50 wasted years
Nehru was
here, and India had the 3% gap. Now
Nehru is dead, and his acolytes are out, and India now has
managed to get back to 7+ % growth, which is what Hindu India
enjoyed before the Muslim and Christian colonization sprees.
The 8.4% growth achieved in Q2FY2003 is
an indication of the true Hindu rate of growth. Clearly the
Nehruvian Albatross is now gone. And good riddance,
too.
Nehru, being
himself a deracinated person with no understanding of Indian
culture (read his autobiography where he confesses that he was
brought up as an Uncle Tom, a little Briton in brownface), hoped
to create good coolies for the use of his idols, the British and
the Communists. Nehru was not burdened with a massive intellect
(as he admits in his autobiography) or with great knowledge (as
you can see from the absolute howlers in his Glimpses of
World History, which should be titled more properly The
Word According to Garp and shelved under 'fiction'). He
wanted, in continuation of the Macaulayite project, to create
de-Indianized and de-Hinduized robots, much like himself.
Chou en Lai,
in one of his more lucid moments, called Jawaharlal Nehru a
'useful idiot.'
(source: The
Nehruvian Penalty: 50 wasted years - By Rajeev Srinivasan
and His
Master's Voice: Pavlovian Comrades - By Rajeev Srinivasan
- rediff.com).
Top
of Page
Restoration
on at Konark Temple
Konark,
India, November 30, 2003: Restoration work is on at the famous
Sun Temple at Konark in India but conserving heritage and
keeping the old look alive doesn't seem too easy. Broken pieces
of carved stones that once formed part of the temple have been
ignored since the conservation work on the 13th century temple
began 100 years ago. They are finally in demand for the first
phase of restoration work. The method used in the restoration
work is one that will help preserve the ancient temple in all
its glory, according to KJ Luka, a conservationist with the
Archaeological Survey of India. In the last 10 years, the world
heritage monument has got a facelift. The surface has been
thoroughly cleaned and is no longer a Black Pagoda as 19th
century mariners described it. But there is a lot that needs to
be done.


The seaside monument devoted
to the Sun God is known for its magnificent design, exquisite
carvings and erotic sculptures and draws millions of tourists
every year.
***
The seaside monument devoted
to the Sun God is known for its magnificent design, exquisite
carvings and erotic sculptures and draws millions of tourists
every year. But the tragedy of the temple is that 100
years after the first steps were taken to preserve this glorious
monument, it's still a crumbling ruin.
(source: Restoration
on at Konark Temple - Hinduism Today).
For more refer to chapter on Hindu
Art). For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
Top
of Page
The
Fiction of Aryan Invasion Theory -
By Swami Prakashanand Saraswati
The preplanned scheme of Jones to introduce the idea that
Sanskrit was an outside language gave birth to the speculation
of the imagined existence of some Central Asian (Aryan) race who
spoke Sanskrit and who brought Sanskrit language to India when
they forcefully entered the country. In this way, the fiction of
the Aryan Invasion was created much later, sometime in the
1800’s by the same group of people and was extensively
promoted by Max Muller.
It is a well known fact that India is called Aryavart. Manu
Smriti (2/21,22) describes the exact location of Aryavart which
lies from the south of the Himalayas and all the way up to the
Indian Ocean. Its inhabitants are called the Arya.
But it is not a locally spoken name. But it is not a locally
spoken name. Commonly, we write Bharatvarsh for India in general
and scriptural writings. The territory of India (or Bharatvarsh
for Aryavart) during the Mahabharat war (3139 BC) was up to
Iran. So the ancient Iranian people also used to call themselves
the Aryans.

In the Bharatiya history
there are descriptions of Shak and Hun invasions and also of the
Muslim invasions but never
an Aryan invasion.
(image
source: The True
History and the Religion of India: A Concise Encycloedia of
Authentic Hinduism - By Swami Prakashanand Saraswati)
***
People of the British regime using this information,
fabricated a story that some unknown race of Central Asia who
came and settled in Iran were called the Aryans and they were
Sanskrit speaking people. They invaded India, established
themselves permanently, and wrote the Vedas. Those who
introduced this ideology never cared to produce any evidence in
support of their statement because it never existed, and
furthermore, fiction stories don’t need evidences as they are
self-created dogmas.
If someone carefully looks into the ancient history of India,
he will find that there was no such thing as an Aryan invasion.
Since the very beginning of human civilization, Hindus (Aryans)
are the inhabitants of Bharatvarsh (India) which is called
Aryavart. In the Bharatiya history
there are descriptions of Shak and Hun invasions and also of the
Muslim invasions but never
an Aryan invasion.
Max Muller promoted this invasion story and formulated his
dates of Vedic origin accordingly.
(source: The True
History and the Religion of India: A Concise Encycloedia of
Authentic Hinduism - By Swami Prakashanand Saraswati p.
266- 267). Visit Vedic
Foundation.org. For more refer to chapter on Aryan
Invasion Theory).
Top
of Page
A
Mexican Comes Home to India - By John Compos
When
I’m asked why a non-Indian such as myself would choose
Hinduism, my answer is founded on the practical experience of
spiritual happiness. I found that the wisdom contained in the
Hindu scriptures was a deep well from which I could replenish my
spiritual needs. The discovery was so profound to me, because in
searching for personal meaning in my life, I
found great solace in Hinduism’s lucid philosophy and
teachings of love to a personal form of God, Radha-Krishn.
My
previous religious studies in years past were fruitless in that
they had not inspired spiritual desire in me. And my reading of
western philosophers’ writings impressed me as being dry,
intellectual speculations. In contrast, the deep love and
devotion to God that manifests in the lives of the great Saints
of the Hindu tradition appeals to me. Their promise that through
loving devotion – bhakti – one can merge, know, and see God
in divine personal form encourages me to have faith in this
universal and great religion. By one’s sincere effort and
God’s grace, God’s love would fructify in the heart. It did
not matter what my race, gender, or belief was. This is the
central teaching of Hinduism.
Many
non-Indians have recognized the spiritual wealth of Hinduism and
have liberally taken from its treasures: its teachings of bhakti
meditation to a personal form of God; its Sanskrit scriptures
and verses; its instruction on the philosophy of living are but
a few of its priceless spiritual jewels. But what is a troubling
and growing phenomenon, however, is that it seems that Indians
who are Hindus by birth do not value the immense wealth of their
birthright. And in the process, I believe they are becoming
spiritually bankrupt.
Many
Indians who immigrate to the United States have many things in
common. They’re educated, they’re ambitious, and they’re
lured by the promise of material success. But along the way to
material achievement, it appears to me that many forget their
birthright to the great spiritual ancestry that is Hinduism.
Unfortunately for many Hindus, forgetting their spiritual
ancestry for the sake of material gain brings to mind a Spanish
dicho (saying): "Quien mucho abarca poco aprieta"
(Whoever grasps much can hold on to little). Indeed, for the
sake of enormous material acquisition, it is nearly impossible
to hold on to that which is paramount for a soul’s
contentment: God’s love.
(source:
A
Mexican Comes Home to India - By John Compos - Vedic
Foundation.org).
Top
of Page
Majuli:
Island in the Sun
Hindu priests from Assam have sought Indian Prime Minister
Atal Bihari Vajpayee's intervention to save the
ancient seat of Vaishnavite culture on Majuli island from
erosion by the Brahmaputra river. Majuli,
the world's largest riverine island, is currently home to 14 'satras',
or Vaishnavite monasteries but their future has been threatened
by the mighty Brahmaputra, which erodes almost 14 sq km of land
every year.
A group of 'satradhikars' or head priests, accompanied by
Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi called on Vajpayee here Friday
to urge to take immediate steps to save Majuli and to get it
enlisted as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO.

Majuli
is a creation of none other than the master craftsman who
moulded the universe-God himself.
***
The total area of Majuli has been
whittled down from 1,245 sq km to about 550 sq km after the
Brahmaputra changed its course following an earthquake in 1950.
The island, which became a seat of religion, art and culture
after the Vaishnavite renaissance of the 14th and 15th century,
was once home to 70 satras, where hundreds of satras renounced
worldly desires and worked zealously to preserve Assam's
spiritual and cultural heritage. "In view of the great
cultural heritage of Majuli, it is imperative that protection of
the island is taken up on an emergent basis,"
Majuli
is a creation of none other than the master craftsman who
moulded the universe-God himself. No wonder then that the
sublime and the serene atmosphere of the island-the intimate
companionship of the soul with the elements and the river-
provided the backdrop for the historic "Moni Kanchan Sanjog"
between Assam's pioneer Vaishnavite Saints
Sankardeva and his disciple Madhabdeva
in the 15th Century. Ever since that meeting of the great minds
and the subsequent establishment of "Satras" that
followed, Majuli emerged as the crowning glory of Vaishnavite
culture in Assam.

Lord Krishna is
supposed to have played with his consorts here. Sankardeva
visited the island in the early 16 century and propagated a form
of Vaishnavism.
***
Lord Krishna is
supposed to have played with his consorts here. Though thousands
of miles distant from Vrindavan, one only has to visit Majuli
during the Ras-purnima in the month of Kartik to experience
this. Virtually every single person on the island is involved in
the three-day long ras festival, depicting the life of Krishna.
Although the origins of Majuli may be uncertain, it is known for
a fact that the social reformer Sankardeva visited the island in
the early sixteenth century. Sankardeva propagated a form of
Vaishnavism that was simpler and more accessible than the
ritualistic Hinduism of the time. His approach was rooted in
faith and prayer, and stressed on the cultural aspects of life
and living. Sankardeva
had spent ten years as a mendicant itinerant traveller, visiting
all the great pilgrimage sites in the country, to learn from
them. Perhaps it is because of this that people from all over
are able to relate to it.
***
Majuli
Monasteries wake up to conversion threat
- By Pullock Dutta
A
spate of religious conversions on the world’s largest river
island of Majuli has set the stage for a major confrontation
between the upholders of Vaishnavaite culture and the Church.

With
Christianity making inroads into the island, all major satras
have been shaken out of their complacency. A
campaign is underway to bring back Misings who have turned to
Christianity back into the Vaishnavaite fold.
(source:
Save
Majuli - Keralanext.com,
beautifulassam.com
and Majuli
Monasteries wake up to conversion threat
- By Pullock Dutta and Indians
Against Christian Aggression. For more refer to chapter on Conversion).
Refer
to VINDICATED BY TIME: The Niyogi Committee Report On
Christian Missionary Activities -
Christianity
Missionary Activities Enquiry Committee 1956
and
The
Sunshine of Secularism.
Top
of Page
Harvest
of history from a paddy field
The Kerala government is inviting international marine,
archaeological and conservation experts to examine a sailing
vessel excavated from a paddy field. The
vessel is believed to be over 900 years old.
The Kerala government's archaeology department excavated the
22-meter-long and 5-meter-wide ship in June this year from a
paddy field owned by a physician in Thaikal, a coastal village
in Alappuzha. The
ship lying some 50 meters deep was first noticed when its wooden
planks protruded as the field was being tilled. The excavation
began in April 2002 and by June this year a large part of the
vessel was pulled out.

King
Pratapamalla.
***
Sensing the historical significance the vessel holds, the state
government has now asked international experts to conduct
research studies on it.Registrar of the Center for Heritage
Studies P K Gopi said the Kerala government will soon send
invitations to experts across the world for a study conference,
scheduled tentatively for January next year. "We want
international experts to come here and study the ship. We are
sure it would throw up many mysteries of history, especially of
India's maritime history," Gopi told rediff.com.
The Kochi-based CHR is a government-funded heritage research
institute.
Gopi said a large portion of the vessel, including its hull, is
intact. "We believe the ship to be approximately 920 years
old. We have arrived at its age after conducting carbon dating
tests on its wood," he said.
The vessel has been made of sturdy local wood variety, anjili,
he said. "But the technique used in making this vessel is
not Indian. We believe the ship was made either in China, Japan,
Egypt or some Arab country. In the 12th century, lots of people
from these countries used to come to the Kerala coast for
trading," Gopi said. For centuries, Romans, Chinese, Arabs, Portuguese, Frenchmen,
Dutchmen, Britons and Jewish merchants came to Kerala in search
of the state's fabled spices. Already, the ship's discovery has
elicited considerable international attention.
In May, Professor Ralph Pederson, a marine archaeologist from
the Nautical Archaeology Division of the Texas A&M
University visited the excavation site. Prof Pederson and some
other experts have agreed that the vessel is over 900 years old.
Prof Pederson has, however, suggested that the remnants of the
ship be put to 'thermo luminescent testing' for a more accurate
estimate.
A team of researchers from the Southampton University visited
the excavation site early this year. The researchers working
under Dr Lucy Blue, a specialist in maritime archaeology at the
University's Center for Marine Archeology, spent several days at
the site.
(source: Harvest
of history from a paddy field - rediff.com).
Top
of Page
Christianity
faces bleak future in UK: Survey
Traditional
Christianity faces a bleak future in the United Kingdom where
people are turning to, among other things, yoga and New Age
spirituality, a opinion poll has revealed. Although
many Britons still believe in God and find Jesus Christ
inspirational, thousands of others are abandoning the church,
replacing it with activities that focus on themselves. They
found that belief in Christianity had begun making way for
belief in Islam and New Age spirituality.
"The
outlook for traditional Christianity is bleak. But it's
different elsewhere. Hindus,
Sikhs, Jews and Buddhists remain sizeable groups and New Age
beliefs are now mainstream. "For many, reflexology,
reiki,
spiritual healing, yoga and
crystal healing are part of everyday life," he said.
Some
23 per cent believe in reincarnation.
(source: Christianity
faces bleak future in UK: Survey - rediff.com).
The
Christian churches have all but disappeared from the lives of
the British people. The chapels of Wales are gaunt ruins, the
great Roman Catholic churches of the industrial North West are
often empty and derelict, the Anglicans scuttle about
in their hallowed, lovely buildings like mice amid ancient
ruins, rarely even beginning to fill spaces designed for
multitudes. The
choirs and the bells gradually fall silent, the hymns are no
longer sung and one by one the doors are locked and places which
in some cases have seen worship for centuries become bare
museums of a dead faith. Few
listen to what these churches say. They have become exclusive
clubs, whose members celebrate bizarre rituals which are
baffling to outsiders.
(source:
Will
Britain convert to Islam? -
By Peter
Hitchens -
Mail on Sunday 11/2/03).
Top
of Page
Food in
Ancient India
The Upanishads state: "Annam Brahma" - "Food is
God." and therefore it must be given the highest veneration. Even
today, in many Indian homes, be they meager or affluent, a symbolic
offering of food is given to Brahma before every meal. In the Upanishads, a Hindu religious text, food is called
"panacea" because all animate life depends on it. According to
them, purity of food leads to purity of thought and action.
"He thought himself:
Here now are worlds and world guardians,
Let me create food for them.
He brooded upon the waters.
From them when they have been brooded upon,
a material form was produced.
Verily, that material form which was produced,
Verily, that is food. - Aitareya Upanishad.
A hereditary cook should be vigilant, well versed in science, clean,
devoted and possessed of the auspicious bodily marks." - Ksema
Kutahala.
Philosophy of Indian Food

Brahmins lunch with Nal,
royal author of a 5th century cookbook.
(image
source: Cooking of the Maharajas – By Shivaji Rao and
Shalini Devi Holkar)
***
One of the earliest cookbooks written in
India is attributed to Nal, the hero, was given at the time of his
wedding the gift of preparing food, not ordinary food, but such as
should be fit for the gods who had granted him this gift.
Three Basic Qualities
Tamas,
Rajas, and Sattwas
The essence of the world and all that is in it is composed of
these three qualities: Tamashika, Rajashika, and the saintly Sattvika.
In every food, and in every man, one of these qualities predominates and
determines the nature of the being.


three
basic qualities
(image
source: Cooking of the Maharajas – By Shivaji Rao and
Shalini Devi Holkar)
Tamashika is the dark nature. A man of such nature is
characterized by shortness and corpulence, despondency, stupidity,
impiety. He is prone to stupefaction, perversity of the intellect, and
lethargy in action. In short a highly disagreeable being.
Such a man takes food which is putrid and stale. Worse, it is
cold and flat.. made up of the leavings of others. He eats pork, and
beef, eels and turnips. Strong spirits and dark grains can tempt him.
Things such as garlic and onion – being shaped like the head – were
forbidden to some Hindus, but Tamashika eats them with impunity.
Rajashika is the passionate nature. The Rajashika man has
feelings of much pain and misery; he had a roving spirit as well as an
overwhelming confidence in how own experience. Tall, muscular,
passionate, he is full of physical energy. But thanks to his nature he
is prone to the following: vanity, pride, lust – and on top of that
anger, and hilarity. Rajashika food is bitter and sour; it is saline,
pungent, and astringent as well. Included in his diet are mutton and
fish, and also poultry and game.
Sattvika is the well-balanced nature.
The Sattvika man is characterized by medium height, a fine
and slender body, a judicious regimen of diet, longevity, and a strong
belief in God, a good retentive memory and the performance of good deeds
regardless of consequences. He is prone to forbearance, truthfulness,
intellect, understanding, and courage….and so on.
His food is agreeable and bland, milk, yogurt, clarified
butter, wheat, fruits and vegetables without heaviness, spinach,
lentils, lotus and mangoes.
“A person should eat in accordance with his natural fires,
after decorating himself and entering the dinning pavilion.” – Ksema
Kutuhala – a Hindu
cookery book of the 2nd century A.D.
“One who sleeps once a day and eats twice lives for a
hundred years. “ Ksema Kutuhala
An old cookbook from the 5th century Pak Shashtra
– by Nal, a famous legendary king.
The kitchen should be set up in the southeast part of the
house which will also be a place of eating activity.
Hindus set aside the first morsel of each meal as symbolic
tithe for the holy.
(source: Cooking of the Maharajas – By Shivaji Rao and
Shalini Devi Holkar p. 1-51)
Top
of Page
Anapurna
- Consort of Shiva
Shiva's consort has many aspects, and in
one of them she is Annapurna, goddess of food
and abundance. Although Shiva is all powerful, his
power derives from her generosity, as we see in a beautiful old Sanskrit
saying:
He
(Shiva) is five-faced himself.
Of his two sons, one has six faces (Skanda Kartikeya)
And the other is elephant-faced (Ganesh).
He himself is without apparel (an ascetic).
How could he live, and maintain himself.
If Annapurna were not in his house?
India is blessed with a
profusion of vegetarian delicacies: pumpkin, eggplant, plantains,
coconuts, watermelons, turmeric, ginger, limes, ground nuts, sugar cane,
and dozens of others unknown to the West. The holy Ganga has provided
Benares with a thick layers of magnificent soil that produces vegetables
of legendary taste and quality.
" After a fast a
feasting; and after a feasting a fast." - Proverb of Northern
India.
(image source: Cooking of the Maharajas – By Shivaji Rao and
Shalini Devi Holkar)
The fames of Indian spices is
older than recorded history. Centuries before Greece and Rome
had their birth, sailing ships carried Indian spices, perfumes,
and silks to Mesopotamia, Arabia and Egypt. It was the lure of
these exotic products that brought many seafarers to the shores
of India. Long before the birth of Christ, Greek merchants
thronged the markets of South India, buying spices among other
precious things. Epicurean Rome spent fortunes on Indian spices,
gems, silks, and brocades. The Parthian Wars are believed to
have been fought by Rome largely to keep the open trade route to
India.
Almost all of the herbs and
spices found in the world are used in the 3,000 year old Indian
medical system of Ayurveda (science of life). Unlike
conventional Western medicine, which tends to treat the disease
rather than the patient, the system of Ayurveda medicine treats
and heals, the whole person - physically, psychologically, and
spiritually. Spices and herbs plays an important role in this
holistic treatment method.
"We shall tell you next of the great
kingdoms of Malabar, which has a king and a language all of its own...In
this kingdom there is great abundance of pepper and also of ginger,
besides cinnamon in plenty and other spices, turbit and coconuts...When
merchants come here from overseas they load their ships with brass,
which they use as ballst, cloth of gold and silk, sandal, gold, silver,
cloves, spikenard, and other such spices....You must know that ships
come here from very many parts....and goods are exported to many
parts." - Travels
of Marco Polo
Malabar was rich. Her kings wore jewels
beyond any trader's imagination and supervised commerce that was,
literally, the incarnation of the West's wildest dreams. Travelers
described what they saw in Malabar with wonder that bordered on awe: the
people, their habits, their dress, their religion and, above all, their
treasured spices.
(source: Cooking of the Maharajas – By Shivaji Rao and
Shalini Devi Holkar p. 1-51 and 290)
Top
of Page
Scenic
India – By W J Grant
Scenically India is rich. She has stupendous mountains and
quiet, village-dotted plains. Her rivers sweep majestically on
the plains and sing silver songs among the hills. The Himalayas
form a great northern battlement with an average height of about
18,000 feet. Their glories are Mount Everest (29,002 feet);
Kanchinjunga; (28,156 feet) Dhawalagiri (26,825 feet);
Nanda-devi (25,700 feet) and Chumalhari (23, 929 feet).
The grandeur of this region outwits description, its scale is
so baffling. It is a dwelling place for gods. I remember my
first impression of these terrifying heights. I had traveled all
night from Calcutta and was sleepily shaving when the train came
to a standstill. For a moment there seemed to be nothing but the
baked plains which I had watched for hours the evening previous.
Then I chanced to look up. There away in the zenith were what
appeared to be aerial icebergs; white mists lay along their
splendor in long level strata.

The glistening robes of Kanchinjunga: If there is anything
in the Hindu idea of being blended with a universality. I came very near it at that moment.
***
Never have I felt sublimity more powerfully in command of my
feelings. I was an emotional consciousness, but that was all. If
there is anything in the Hindu idea of being blended with a
universality I came very near it at that moment. It
was as if the heavens had opened and revealed God on His throne.
A throne of stupendous whiteness, mystery, power, majesty. But
above all, mystery – that mystery no science can banish, and
no reason conquer.
And that is what the Himalayas have remained for me. They are
still the mysterious home of the gods. Useless to tell me that
the peaks are gneissic and the valley metamorphic; that they are
but considerable wrinkles caused by cosmic stresses. I shall
continue to regard them as regions where the Supernatural walks
with regal feet. The scenic vastness kills petty conceits. I
watched the glistening robes of Kanchinjunga. To me it was as
good as a daily prayer. That mighty mass of naked white rising
up to the blue of heaven was like a miracle of holiness; it
spoke to me in measureless proof.
(source:
The Spirit of India - By W J Grant
London published by
B. T. Batsford Ltd. 1933 p. 11- 13). For more on W
J Grant refer to chapter on Quotes101_120).
For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
Top
of Page
Dialectical
vandalism - by Balbir Punj
Leftist 'secularism' dictates Taslima
Nasreen's new novel be
banned because it hurts Muslim sentiments. But Hindu sentiments
aren't worth a farthing-hence, the Saraswati Vandana could be
derided.
Opposition to the Saraswati Vandana
is nothing short of cultural vandalism.
The world
over, the communists have specialised in this art. In communist
countries, artistic and cultural activities must conform to
communist notions even at the cost of the nation's heritage. India
has been steeped in spirituality since times immemorial. The
communist agenda in the Indian context means more than
suppression of religious or spiritual sentiments. It signifies a
great loss to the country's heritage and culture.

Saraswati is an
ennobling icon of knowledge, art and music. According to Sister
Nivedita, the goddess symbolises the highest tribute mankind
ever paid to knowledge.
***
Saraswati is an
ennobling icon of knowledge, art and music. According to Sister
Nivedita, the goddess symbolises the highest tribute mankind
ever paid to knowledge. To negate Saraswati is to symbolically
disrespect the values associated with her: Sublimity, excellence
and subtlety. No wonder, Bengal's academia has declined under
the Marxist regime.
To the uninitiated this opposition to Saraswati Vandana may
be somewhat a matter of disbelief also. The cult of Saraswati,
the goddess of learning, is primarily prevalent amongst
Bengalis. The two most popular Saraswati Vandanas or hymns to
goddess Saraswati were composed by the Hindi poet, Surya Kant
Tripathi 'Nirala' (1896-1961), who was born and brought up in
Bengal and had greater mastery over Bengali than Hindi in his
early years. Nirala, was anti-capitalist-or socialist-and all
secular contemporary trends in Hindi literature could be
attributed to him. But he never disowned Saraswati, Sri Ram, or
Guru Govind Singh.
The
communist argument, led to its logical conclusion, would fall as
an axe on many of our national motifs. Should
we scrap our national motto-Satyamev Jayate (truth shall
triumph)-because it is comes from the Upanishads? Should
we change LIC's slogan-"Yogekshem Vahamyam"-which is
from the Bhagvad Gita? Must we not then scrap the
wheel in our national flag since it is the Dharma-chakra, dharma
being unsecular to communists? Even Indonesia, a Muslim-majority
country that was ruled by a communist dictatorship for 30 years,
introduced a new Rupiah (currency note) after the East Asian
economic crisis in 1997. The currency
notes had an imprint of Lord Ganesh, a symbol of auspiciousness.
Lord Navneet Dholakia, a Member of the British House of
Lords, had Om and a Ganesh image embossed on his coat of arms.
Naturally, Britain didn't find it communal but artistic. In the
Irish Embassy in New Delhi, a statue of Ganesh has not only been
installed by the Irish Ambassador, but it is regularly
worshipped and prasad distributed. The Canadian Parliament
hosted Laxmi puja during Diwali and called it an "end of
spiritual darkness". Can one say these countries are not
secular? Rather these countries are far better off than West
Bengal, whose economy has been brought to an abysmal condition
by Marxist rule.
Remember the landmark judgment of the US Supreme Court which
once said that, though the American state is secular, the
American country is Christian. So the American President takes
his oath by keeping his hand on the Bible and the dollar bill
says 'In God we trust'.
(source: Dialectical
vandalism - by Balbir Punj
- dailypioneer.com -
December 5' 2003).
***
West
Bengal Marxist Chief
Minister, Mr.Budhdeb Bhattacharjee has expressed his displeasure
over the practice of chanting of “Saraswati Bandana” at
the beginning of govt. functions and has urged him to stop the
practice immediately. He has categorically mentioned that, it is
unethical and unhealthy for
a secular country like India, to follow a particular religious
belief. He has referred to the opening ceremony of “Bharatiyam
Cultural Multicomplex” at Salt Lake City, where the
Vice President, the Union Human Resource Minister and himself
were present. He mentioned that the incident was embarrassing
not only for him, but also for other secular minded people,
present at the ceremony.
(source:
Ganashakti
Newsmagazine).
There
was a time that Gopalkrishna Gokhale's
statement: 'What Bengal thinks today, India thinks tomorrow,'
was true for a variety of fields. In science, literature,
culture, philosophy, and politics, many giants of the
Indian renaissance of the past two centuries were Bengalis. But
no more!
Bengal's
current leaders are prophets looking backwards.
Kolkata
is perhaps the world's last bastion of orthodox Marxist ideology.
An elitist attitude, springing from a colonial way of seeing
India, makes the Left decry the use of the traditional arati
as formal welcome, but finds nothing wrong with the ritual and
garb at the university convocations that spring from Christian
ceremony.
But Saraswati
in India is like the Goddesses Fortuna and Liberty of the Roman
religion. Marxists have no hesitation in invoking Fortune and
Liberty, presumably because they are a part of European culture,
from which Marx's ideology emerged. The
Left's antipathy to Saraswati is nothing more than a slavish
repetition of the colonial prejudices of the Europeans about
Indian culture a hundred years ago. The
Left needs to recognize that culture is an expression of a
variety of aesthetic attitudes. Its proclaimed distaste for the
traditional Saraswati Vandana
can only be viewed as petty narrow-mindedness. Even if its
aesthetic sense is different -- and superior -- to that of the
desi BJP's, doesn't the democratic impulse require that it focus
on the substantial issues of governance and put up with the poor
taste of its political opponents with good humour?
(source:
Prophets
Facing Backwards - By Subhash Kak - rediff.com).
For more by Subhash Kak refer to chapter on Quotes221_250).
Top
of Page
Thailand,
Nepal honor legendary Indian
King - Janak of Ancient Mithila
A legendary Indian king is being feted by Nepal
and Thailand this week.
The two countries are coming together
to pay a tribute to King Janak of ancient Mithila on
the occasion of the 76th birthday of King Bhumibol Adulyadej of
Thailand as well as the Thai National Day.
The Nepalese translation of a magnum opus by the Thai king
himself, "The Mahajanaka: The Story of King Janak of
Ancient Mithila", will be distributed free in Nepal to
symbolise the ties between Nepal and Thailand. The genesis of
the royal book goes back to 1977 when King Bhumibol was
listening to a sermon about King Janak from "Tripitaka",
the sacred texts of Theravada Buddhism.
The Thai royal was especially impressed by a tale about King
Janak's visit to the royal park in Mithila, believed to have
been located in modern day Bihar in India. At the entrance of
the park, the story went, stood a fruit-bearing mango tree and a
barren one. While coming out of the park, the king saw that the
mango tree with delicious fruits had been uprooted by his
entourage. The parable taught the lesson that good things are
endangered by greed.
King Janak is said to have been revered
for his just ways as well as being the father of Sita, the
consort of god Ram.
"The
underlying themes of self-reliance, moderation and compassion in
the story of King Janak struck a chord with the king's Thai
subjects who were increasingly disenchanted with materialism in
an era of instant gratification," wrote
Sudhindra Sharma, a visiting scholar at The Institute of Asian
Studies at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok.
The Thai king's daughter, Princess Maha Chakkri Sirindhorn, a
student of linguistics and Sanskrit, is said to be researching
King Janak and Mithila.
(source: Thailand,
Nepal honor legendary Indian
King -
Newindpress.com
- December 6 2003).
Watch History
of Ayodhya - videogoogle.com.
For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
and Glimpses
XVI
Top
of Page
Doubting Thomas is a
Doubtful Thomas
An invite to our office, sent for the
consecration of a local church, said that 'Christianity came to
India 2000 years ago with the arrival of St Thomas. In fact,
Christianity came to India before it reached the shores of
Portugal or England'.
Obviously, the attempt to pass off myth
as history and pre-date the antiquity of Christianity in India
to suit evangelical conveniences has not stopped.
Thomas, incidentally from whom the usage Doubting Thomas
emerged, is said to have arrived in India in AD 52 with Habban,
a foreign trader. He was said to have landed at Maliankara (Cranganore)
in Kerala, preached the gospel, wrought miracles, and got many
converts. Then he was said to have come to Mailepuram (Mylapore),
then went to China, after some time returned to Maliankara, and
from there came again to Madras where he spent the rest of his
life teaching, preaching and drawing a large number to the fold
of his religion. His conversion activities got the ire of some
of the locals and he had to hide himself in a cave at the Little
Mount near the present St. Thomas Mount. Finally, he was
murdered at St. Thomas Mount and his body was brought to
Mylapore and buried in A.D. 73 at a spot which was forgotten for
many centuries. Nearly fifteen hundred years after he was
supposed to have died, there was a rediscovery of the tomb and
the remains of Thomas including pieces of bones, a skull, a
vessel containing mud supposedly from the place where his blood
was shed, and a spearhead of the shape of an olive leaf fixed on
a wooden shaft.'
This
is the story on Thomas in currency now. Of course, nobody deemed
it fit to ask how even after several centuries that the remains
of Thomas remained. Anyway, in that place, in 1893 the present
Santhome Church was built. The papal seal over this whole story
was given in 1956 when Pope Pius XII gave it recognition as a
Minor Basilica, all the four major ones being outside India. But
serious historians, backed by intense research, have a totally
different story to tell, especially about the St Thomas church
on how it came about.
Historians vouch that there is a strong
reason to believe that the St. Thomas Church stands on the ruins
of a Jain Neminathaswami temple and a Shiva temple which had a
Nataraja shrine attached. Epigraphical data for the
existence of the Jain temple on this site is said to be recorded
in Jain Inscriptions in the State by A Ekambaranath and C K
Sivaprakasham (Research Foundation for Jainology, Madras, 1987).
More importantly, evidences have emerged, especially in the book
'The Saint Thomas Myth' in India by Ved
Prakash, for the existence of the Shiva temple, which
might have been the original Kapaleeswara Temple.
In another book Papacy: Its Doctrine
and History, historian Sita
Ram Goel writes that Western historians themselves
have seriously doubted the very existence of an apostle named
Thomas. He writes: 'Distinguished scholars like Richard
von Garbe, A Harnack and L de la Vallee-Poussin have
denied credibility to the Acts of Thomas. Some
others, who accept the fourth century Catholic tradition about
the travels of St. Thomas, point to the lack of evidence that he
ever went east beyond Ethiopia and Arabia Felix. The confusion,
according to them, has arisen because the ancient geographers
often mistook these two countries for India. The issue has been
taken up by Stephen Neill (a
Bishop who had worked in India) in his History
of Christianity in India: The Beginnings to 1707
AD. He has said that 'Thomas romances reflect the vividness of
imaginations rather than the prudence of rigid historical
critics. He said 'millions of Christians in India are certain
that the founder of their church was none other than apostle
Thomas himself. The historian cannot prove it to them that they
are mistaken in their belief. He may feel it right to warn them
that historical research cannot pronounce on the matter with a
confidence equal to that which they entertain by faith.'
Historians now say that the St Thomas
story was a fabrication of Portuguese whose domination of
Mylapore was from 1522 to 1697. The destruction of the temple of
Kapaleeshwara is said to have taken place in 1561. It was later
rebuilt elsewhere 250 years after it was demolished. Portuguese
track record is such that they destroyed many Hindu temples
during the course of their rule in Goa. Raking up the past is
not nice, but when the present is mislead using spurious
stories, the truth has to be told.
(For more on history of Portuguese in India refer to
chapter on European
Imperialism).
And the time to call the Thomas bluff is now.
(source:
Doubting
Thomas is a Doubtful Thomas - newstodaynet.com -
December 19' 2003). for more refer to The
Myth of Saint Thomas and The
Myth of Saint Thomas and the Mylapore Shiva Temple - By
Ishwar Sharan and chapter on Caste
system.
In Catholic universities in Europe, the myth of the apostle Thomas
going to India is no longer taught as history, but in India it is still
considered useful. Richard Von Garbe (1857-1927), German Indologist, who studied the Samkhya and
Yoga schools of philosophy, who examined the mutual influence of Western and
Indian ideas, doubted the historicity of the legend of St. Thomas.
(source: Decolonising
The Hindu Mind
- Ideological Development of Hindu Revivalism - By Koenraad
Elst Rupa Publisher ISBN: 81-7167-519-0
p. 276 and German
Indologists: Biographies of Scholars in Indian Studies writing in German
- By Valentine Stache-Rosen. p.133-135).
Top
of Page
'I
proud to be an Indian'- the darker side of West
Bollywood film lays bare ugly face of racism in Britain
The
London-born director Puneet Sira of the film "I…Proud
to be an Indian" has
departed radically from the usual use by Bollywood film
producers of castles, London landmarks and Scottish landscapes
as backdrops to romantic storylines. The
film is a violent Bollywood melodrama about Asians
fighting skinheads on the streets of London.
Sira has based it on his own experiences of growing up in East
London in the 70s when attacks on Asians were almost a daily
routine.
But
unlike now, in the 70s most immigrants kept quiet. They did not
write back to warn relatives and friends in India about the
racism. But Sira's film could explode the El Dorado image of
Britain that induces would be immigrants to sell all to come
here.
In
an interview with the Daily Telegraph Sira said: "Indian
moviegoers are used to seeing Britain as a fantasy land where
everyone goes to school in helicopter and lives in an ancient
mansion.
"I'm
showing them the raw reality of racist violence, and that's
never been done before in Bollywood." He added:
"Nobody in India knows about skinheads. You tell people in
Bombay about the BNP ( right-wing British National Party) and
they just look puzzled.
"They
have just never heard about the abuse and violence British
Asians have suffered. This film is going to tell them what it is
really like. We are aiming at a diverse audience --- everybody
from trendy Londoners to Delhi rickshaw drivers."
"They have just never heard about the abuse and violence
British Asians have suffered. This film is going to tell them
what it is really like. We are aiming at a diverse audience ---
everybody from trendy Londoners to Delhi rickshaw drivers."
Sira denied in his interview
with the daily that the film was anti-British. He
hopes that it will open the eyes of Indians to the problems of
racist violence if they visit.
Sira
says the film will make Indians understand that all is not good
in the west. "There is a dark side to western society,
too." "I hope to show the movie to the
Prime Minister A B Vajpayee and the deputy Prime Minister, L K
Advani," he adds.
(source: Bollywood
film lays bare ugly face of racism in Britain -
By Vijay Dutt - hindustantimes.com and I
proud to be an Indian explores racial discrimination in UK).
Top
of Page
Indian
Communism - By Amaury de Riencourt
Nothing
is more illuminating in this respect than a study of the fate of
Indian Communism. Compared with its powerful Chinese
counterpart, the Indian communist movement floundered
hopelessly. While it is certain that the British kept a tight
grip on the situation from a purely political standpoint, it is
becoming clear that the failure of Indian Communism had more
fundamental reasons. The October Revolution struck some members
of India’s intelligentsia as being the outstanding political
phenomenon of their age. Jawaharlal
Nehru
himself claims
that “ A study of Marx and Lenin produced a powerful effect on
my mind and helped me see history and current affairs in a new
light. The long chain of history and of social development
appeared to have some meaning, some sequence, and the future
lost some of its obscurity.” Nehru then goes on to express a
mixture of admiration for the “practical achievements of the
Soviet Union” and dislike for its ruthless methods.
Like
most of his compatriots who were aware of world politics, Nehru
remained essentially nationalist whose intellectual
justification was based on a perspective of past history but who
remained tied to the practical, evolutionary concept of Western
Socialism.
The British had artificially
created a new capitalist class of landowners (zamindars and
taluqdars) and had contributed to the development of private
capitalism in the big cities, which had then imposed what Nehru
called “the bania civilization of the capitalist West”.

Marxism
awakens no true echo in the soul of India.
***
Until the end
of World War II, Indian Communism as such had not really made a
shred of progress. Marxism had failed to make a profound impact
on the intelligentsia for basic reasons which are rooted in the
psychology and philosophical dispositions of the Indians:
dogmatism, to start with, has always repelled the Indians –
whether Christian or Marxist-Leninist.
Marxism
awakens no true echo in the soul of India.
(source:
The
Soul of India – by Amaury de Riencourt
p. 330 0 333).
The
Indian communists failed to produce even one world figure,
whereas the Indian "bourgeois" threw up dozens of
great personalities like Swami Vivekananda, Sri Aurobindo, B G
Tilak, Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and many others. The
Indian communists were too eager to take orders from Moscow or
Beijing. They could never produce an ideology that was
relevant to Indian life, to Indian
civilization, to Indian
ethos, and to Indian experience.
And there is one more
significant reason: while the Chinese communists were, first of
all, nationalists and were chauvinistic about the
"greatness" of their country and its "great"
civilisation, the Indian communists were willing to forget
India's past.
(source: Marxist
Road to Nowhere - Flawed ideology, misplaced zeal -
By Hari Jaisingh- Tribuneindia.com Novemeber 30 2000
- Hindu Vivek Kendra).
For more on Amaury de Riencourt refer to chapter on Quotes301_320).
For
interesting article refer to
His
Master's Voice: Pavlovian Comrades - By Rajeev Srinivasan
- rediff.com).
Top
of Page
Stalin’s Indian victims
KGB records
show that 45 Indians were killed in Stalin’s purges. But the
Indian government is showing little interest in its lost men.
For a number
of Indians, including those born in Bangladesh and Pakistan, the
lure of Russia proved fatal. They were drawn to Bolshevism by
Lenin and his famous thesis on the National and Colonial
Question at the Second Congress of the Comintern 1920. They met
their end at the hands of Jossef Stalin.
KGB
archival records show that as many as ‘45 Indian
revolutionaries were sent to firing squads on trumped-up charges
of espionage and conspiracies’. Records collected in the
Memorial, an institute run by Russian Indologist Yan Rachinskii
in Moscow, show that 12 of the 45 Indians have been identified.
They all lived in Moscow. The Indian
Communists in Russia, who held a special relation
with several Indian revolutionaries including Savarkar and also
the Communist Party of Great Britain, were sent to firing squads
just before Stalin signed the Treaty of Non-Aggression with
Germany in 1939. One of them was Birendra Nath Chatterjee,
brother of Sarojini Naidu. Chatterjee joined hands with Savarkar
to launch a nation-wide movement against the British Government.
After travelling in Europe he went to the Soviet Union in 1918
and joined the Comintern. He survived the war of succession
following Lenin’s death but was arrested in 1937 and put
before the firing squad.
Another was
Abani Mukherjee whose Russian name was Mukherjee Trilokovich. A
professor of history at the Moscow State University, he was
arrested and shot the same year as Chatterjee.
(source: Stalin’s
Indian victims - indianexpress.com).
Top
of Page
Lord
Rama has Muslim devotees -
By Alka Rastogi
While
the seat of Lord Rama in Ayodhya may still be mired in
controversies, that is no deterrent for some followers of Islam
who have taken to enacting the Ram Lila.

Watch History
of Ayodhya - videogoogle.com.
***
Bizarre
as it may sound in a day and age of mounting communal tensions,
there are several Muslims who make up the cast at the
Bakshi-Ka-Talab Ram Lila that will conclude on Wednesday, long
after Dusshera is past. Naseem Khan, the actor playing the demon
king Ravana, is in fact more at ease answering questions about
Vedic scriptures than most Hindu scholars. Khan has often put
pundits to shame with his encyclopedic knowledge of the Ramayana
that he studies with single-minded devotion despite stiff
opposition from fundamentalist elements within his own
community.
Sabir
Khan and his men are keeping alive a remarkable tradition of
communal harmony begun in 1972 and honoured with the Rashtriya
Ekta Award in 2000 by known other than Prime Minister Atal
Behari Vajpayee. The group regards Lord Rama as a symbol of good
who should be respected and revered by people professing
different faith. Fostering better relations between Hindus and
Muslims is a responsibility they take very seriously and in fact
wanted to stage their performance in Gujarat after the Godhra
riots but financial constraints held them back.
(source: Lord
Rama has Muslim devotees -
By Alka
Rastogi -
hindustantimes.com).
Top
of Page
When in India
- Letter to Rashtrapatiji
"Indians and dogs"
still remain unwelcome in Indian India?
Last
weekend, you see, I caused considerable embarrassment to my host
at the Indian Air Force mess where I had been invited, for
wearing “Indian” clothes. I felt bad for him
because it was his unpleasant task to ask me to leave because
Indian clothes are not permitted according to service
regulations. Of course, I am aware of the rule — how could I
not be, since this is not the first time I have been shown the
door, sometimes even rudely? The Air Force mess, for the record,
was a first; mostly, it is the Indian Army that has done the
honours.
But if I
know the rules, why do I persist in showing up in my formal
Indian wear? Let me take you into confidence, Rashtrapatiji.
Because I am an optimist, I keep hoping
that some babu or clerk will find the anomaly in the club rules
that were probably drafted when we were an angrez colony, and
amend them, so that I can wear my churidaars into an officer’s
institute.
You see, I find nothing offensive about a closed collar kurta.
In fact, most times, it’s more elegant, and certainly more
formal than T-shirts and jeans which, unexpectedly are permitted
at these institutes.
Only, it
seems the army and navy and air force are so busy guarding our
frontiers — as indeed they should — they haven’t managed
the time to look through antiquated rule books for things
civilians like me find an irritant.
I
mean, surely they must know that the British left in 1947, and
that they are now the Indian Army, the Indian Navy and the
Indian Air Force. (For more refer to chapter on European
Imperialism).
I
cannot think of an institution that is as much an outpost of the
Raj as the Gymkhana Club where, till a few years ago, a similar
dress code had existed. The Gymkhana too has had the privilege
of showing me the door on occasion, but I am now perfectly at
home there because some babu seemed to have discovered that the
membership seems to consist entirely of Indians, so it made
sense if they let them in wearing Indian clothes too.
The club isn’t too keen on keds, which is fine by me, but
it’s all right to keep your churidaars on.
The defence
forces cannot be compared with a mere club, of course, and I
would be the first to admit that. But I exert my moral right to
assert that as an Indian and a civilian, it is insulting to be
told that the clothes I wear — formal and elegant, I assure
you, even if “Indian” (whatever that means) — are
unwelcome on the R&R premises of the Indian services.
Wonder
what Gandhiji would have made of such apartheid? Or maybe,
contrary to the Constitution’s guarantee, “Indians and
dogs” still remain unwelcome in Indian India.
(source: When
in India - Letter to Rashtrapatiji - business-standard.com).
Top
of Page
Matter of
mindset
Mahatma
Gandhi lived and died for Muslims. In order to bring about
Hindu-Muslim amity, he led the Khilafat Movement. It failed. The
Hindus of Malabar were massacred by the Moplahs. In
1924, Gandhi's trusted friend, Maulana
Mohammad Ali, made a thundering statement in Aligarh
and Ajmer: "However pure Gandhi's
character may be, he must appear to me, from the point of view
of religion, inferior to any Mussalman, even though he be
without character" (Indian Muslims, Ram Gopal,
Asia Publishing House, New York, 1959). In 1946, Gandhi thought
of offering the prime ministership of India to MA Jinnah in
order to dissuade him from insisting on partition. This too
failed-Nehru had a part to play, of course-and Pakistan was
born. The reason Gandhi could not bring
about Hindu-Muslim unity was that he did not understand the
Muslim mindset.
Prof
Murray T Titus, in his book, Indian Islam (OUP, London, 1930),
rightly states: "The very essence of Islam is that it is
both a religion and a system of government-a church-state ...
politics is not merely politics and religion is not merely
religion."
Indian Islam (OUP, London, 1930),
rightly states: "The very essence of Islam is that it is
both a religion and a system of government-a church-state ...
politics is not merely politics and religion is not merely
religion."
Samuel
Huntington of
the Clash
of Civilizations
fame needs no introduction. In his book of the same name, he
writes,
"Only
in Hindu civilization were religion and politics so distinctly
separated.
"
In Islam, God is Caesar; in China and Japan, Caesar is God; in
orthodoxy, God is Caesar's junior partner."
Hector
Bolitho's book, Jinnah: Creator of Pakistan (p 45, John Murray,
London, 1954), quotes a British authority on Indian affairs, Sir
Perceval Griffiths, on the Muslim League's foundation:
"Philosophers might deplore the fact that Hindus and
Muslims thought of themselves as separate peoples but the
statesman had to accept it". The
fault does not lie with the Muslim, bound by faith to act as he
does.
It
lies with the Hindu leadership that blinks at reality.
(source: Matter
of mindset - By K R Phanda -
dailypioneer.com - November 4 2003).
Top
of Page
Pakistan
asks Hindus to quit military area
The
Peshawar Cantonment Board in Pakistan has served a notice on
Hindus to vacate about 70 houses occupied by them for over 130
years in the cantonment areas there, media reports said.
The
Daily Times quoted a local Hindu leader Ram Lal as saying
that the entire land and property was in the name of one Mehar
Chand Khanna who had bought it way back in the 19th
century.
The
newspaper said the notice was issued last week to the residents
of Kali Bari to vacate around 70 houses and a Hindu temple built
in 1861.
'The
notice was a threat that force would be used if the inhabitants
did not meet the deadline,' it quoted the Cantonment Board as
saying. It also quoted a
Muslim resident of the Hindu-dominated area, Aslam Siraj, as
saying, 'We are worried and do not know where to go if the
authorities use force.' The residents, it said, have also
approached President Pervez Musharraf for relief.
(source: Pakistan
asks Hindus to quit military area - rediff.com).
Top
of Page
Holy Hindu
Bikinis - Hurting Hindu Sentiments again...
Hindu god Vishnu on a range of bikinis
The
bikinis, with an image of what looks like Lord
Ram as the main motif, have been designed by Italian
designer Roberto
Cavalli and this sort of offensive material
really crosses the line, said an anguished Bimal Krisna Das of
the UK's umbrella body for Hindu temples.
The
new protest, somewhat blasphemously dubbed by some commentators
as the "holy bikinis row", includes angry letters to
Cavalli's sprawling, sensuously-designed headquarters in Milan
and the posh London stores stocking his wares. Cavalli is
routinely described by swish stores throughout Western capitals
as the "self-proclaimed king of Italian excess". He is
just the latest of a long line of European and American
commercial enterprises to fall foul of Hindu sentiment.
Till
now, toilet seat covers, boxes of tissues, shoes, sandals and
finger puppets have all been tracked down as bearing
"offensive" images, variously of Lord Krishna, Ram,
Saraswati and so on.
Now, Cavalli may have pushed Hindu sentiment over the edge. In a
new warning note of exasperation about the risk of repeated and
blase re-offending, Das declared Western
companies no longer had the right to offer a lame apology and
the excuse that they don't know anything about Indian culture
and Hinduism.
"The
world is quite small these days," he says.
"Hindus
are naturally tolerant, but there has to be a limit if the line
is crossed," he says. "These deities
are deemed holy and worshipped by millions of Hindus all across
the globe and these garments in question are not just any
garments but underwear and bikinis to be worn by women flaunting
their half disrobed bodies," fumes the official protest
letter to Mohammed al-Fayed, chairman of upmarket Harrods.
(source:
UK
Hindus embark on 'Holy Bikinis' war
- timesofindia.com).
Comments
on the outrage posted on sulekha.com
"I wonder if some Indian designer had
tried to sell them underwear with images of the Virgin Mary or
Christ or a saying from the Koran printed in
"strategic" places, if Harrods
would have accepted them in the first place? I think
not.
As
the story says, Hinduism is rich in colour and iconography - as
is Buddhism - so they naturally attract designers - but these
designers need to show a little common sense and knowledge and
respect. By all means print it on a T-shirt or shirt on skirt,
but not on underwear and skimpy bikini bottoms or on toilet
seats or on shoes. I don't wish for Hindus to become as uptight
as Christians or Muslims when it comes to display of religious
icons, but designers also need to know where to draw the line
and what is tasteful and what is not.
"
(source:
sulekha.com).
"When we see any image of
goddesses we bow our heads with respect and here they were
displayed in such an insulting way" – Ambika
Soni
(source:
Harrods
apology over Hindu bikinis
-
bbc.com).
Buddha
bikini upsets believers
Bangkok, April 21: A
multi-coloured Victoria's Secret swimsuit with an image of the
Buddha on the bikini top is upsetting many deeply traditional
Thais who want its US makers to take it off the shelves. We are
offended and we will have to tell them we are offended,"
said Deputy Prime Minister Wissanu Krea-Ngam, who is also in
charge of Buddhist affairs. The
swimsuit was "too much" and "hurt the hearts of
Buddhists".
(source:
Buddha
bikini upsets believers - indianexpress.com). For
more refer to Victoria's
Secret deny images are that of Buddha, concerted global protest
continues - Asian Tribune).
Top
of Page
Yoga
for Teachers Rouses Ire of Croatian Bishops
Croatian
elementary school teacher Marijana Ivanovic has taken up yoga to
help her relax. Nothing controversial about that, or so she
thought.
"Yoga
really helps recharge one's batteries and eases my lower-back
pain," said Ivanovic, who has taught for more than 30
years, during the first session of a state-supported yoga
program for teachers. But her ancient Indian exercise routine is
at the center of a highly charged public debate because it has
fallen foul of the powerful Roman Catholic church in this
overwhelmingly Catholic country. The
education ministry introduced the program this year as part of
efforts to help teachers work better.
The
ministry awarded 50,000 kuna ($7,624) in annual support to a
local group known as 'Yoga
in Daily Life', which draws on the teachings of Hindu spiritual
leader Paramhans Swami Maheshwarananda, known as Swamiji.
In
July they issued a statement protesting "an attempt to
introduce yoga in the Croatian education system."
The
Croatian Bishops' Conference said the program would "make
an unacceptable favor to an organization and its founder who
wants to introduce Hinduistic religious practice in Croatian
schools." It said everything was being done under the guise
of exercise.
A
Croatian yoga activist, who asked not to be named, said the
bishops were "irritated
by anything related to disciplines of oriental
origin."
The
bishops' statement appeared to have an immediate impact in a
country where almost 90 percent of the people profess to be
Catholic. Local media reported that interest in the yoga program
had fallen sharply after the protest.
Yoga ran into similar trouble in Slovakia in 2001 when a
proposal to teach yoga in schools was eventually dropped in the
face of fierce opposition from Slovakia's Catholic church and
allies in the rightwing
government.
"My
work for world peace and tolerance in different cultures is
above (any) particular religion and any dogma. It is exactly the
context within which one should look at the 'Yoga in Daily Life'
program," Swamiji said.
(source:
Yoga
for Teachers Rouses Ire of Croatian Bishops -
reuters.com).
For more on yoga, refer to chapter on Yoga
and Hindu Philosophy).
Top
of Page
A traditional
sport in decline -`Nada
kusti', the traditional form of wrestling
`Nada
kusti', the traditional form of wrestling, is in the throes of
extinction, thanks largely to Government indifference and lack
of interest among the public.
This
ancient sport, which received royal patronage for centuries and
was supported by philanthropists, is struggling, with many of
the over 70 `garadis' (gymnasiums) in the city and 150 in the
district being on the verge of closure. This is because from
ancient days the `garadis' had depended on contributions for
their existence and did not charge any admission fee. Donations
are not forthcoming now.
Launched
in organized form by Raja Wadiyar in
the 16th century, `nada kusti' touched the zenith
during the rule of Krishnaraj Wadiyar
IV in the first half of the 20th century. Now it has
been relegated to the status of a rural sport. The
wrestlers get a meagre income. In an otherwise gloomy situation,
the only silver lining is that many wrestlers have excelled in
the State and national championships despite all the
shortcomings. While there were over 800 wrestlers in the city,
which was once considered a bastion of the sport, only three
modern mats are available — at Mysore University, the Chamundi
Vihar Stadium and the S. Chennaiah Akada.
The
general secretary of the Mysore District Wrestling Association,
Yajaman S. Mahadev, said that the Government had failed to
promote this sport in the region even though it was essentially
popular among the masses. He said that though Mysore wrestlers
had the upper hand over their rivals they still had to reach the
standards of wrestlers from Punjab, Maharashtra and Punjab.
Scholarships could be provided for the wrestlers as most of them
were from the economically weaker sections of society.
(source:
A
traditional sport in decline - By Sharath S. Srivatsa -
hindu.com).
Top
of Page
Hindu Temples
in Pakistan: Deep in prayer - By Ishtiaq Ali Mehkri
Although
the number of temples in Karachi has dwindled significantly,
those that exist offer a rich spiritual experience, writes
Ishtiaq Ali Mehkri.
The Hindu community, the largest of Pakistan's minorities, is
quite proud of its history and religion. They have made their
presence felt in trade, education and the arts. Hindus in
Karachi comprise a fragile number of around 300,000. Hindus in
Karachi belong mostly to the Rajput and Gujarati communities.
Though the Hindu population is scattered in and around the old
city areas of Karachi, its largest presence is felt around the Swami
Narayan temple, where around 5,000 people reside. The
temple is said to be 150 years old and probably one that was
built with a proper residential plan.
Temples in Karachi have a history
dating back to the pre-partition era. There are even some
temples that boast of their existence from the 14th and 15th
century. It is then tragic to note that history has been unkind
to them as today they lie in shambles.
Many structures have periodically been targeted by fanatics;
they have been ransacked, burnt and severely damaged. Another
1,000 year old temple, famous but seldom attended, stands on the
shores of Manora Island. Tales abound that the temple of Kali
Mata (the goddess of evil), is located somewhere on an island
near Karachi, but the community seemed reluctant to discuss
this.
Nonetheless, a visit to many of the temples depicts a charm of
its own. Elaborately decorated idols, abundant flowers and the
ever present incense, create an enchanting ambience. Artistic
drawings on the walls and floors also add a special touch to the
mood of piety. Furthermore, the pealing of bells creates a
religious atmosphere, in which the fervour of hundreds of
devotees can be felt, as they recite verses in praise of their
Lords. On Mondays a large number of devoteesgo to pay their
respects to Lord Shiva.
The most fascinating aspect of Hinduism
is its the colourful festivals, full of entertainment and
amusement, that are celebrated throughout the year. A few among
them are: Diwali, Ganesh Ganphati (elephant festival), Holi (to
mark the advent of spring), Pongal (harvesting season),
Rakshbandhan or Rakhi (sisters day), Durga Pooja and the
birthdays of Lord Shiva, Rama, and Krishna.
The Hindus in Karachi also have to their credit a number of
educational projects - the prime one among them is the Dayaram
Jethmal (DJ) Science College. With the restoration of the Hindu
Gymkhana, a new leaf has been added to the Hindu community's
archeological treasure in the city. The elders of the community
are saddened to hear that the younger generation is losing touch
with the historic Sanskrit script - the language of the holy
books Gita and Mahabharat
- and this has prevented them from promoting their
language and culture.
(source: Deep
in prayer - By Ishtiaq Ali Mehkri -
dawn.com).
Top
of Page
Miracle healer heals himself at
hospital
His
has been the most notable face among the Christian gospelers. He
has presided over several thousand 'miracle healing' meetings
wherein countless 'sufferers' have had their illness or
afflictions, ranging from common cold to blindness, 'cured'
through prayers.
But
when it came to healing his own troublesome knee, D G S
Dinakaran, the well-known evangelist in question, seems to have
reposed faith with a team of doctors at a local hospital rather
than hobble around and wait for divine help. According
to sources, Dinakaran, the most visible of gospelers with a slew
of radio and TV shows to his credit, had been suffering from a
chronic knee problem. The man, who exhorts the public to attend
his healing and prayer meetings to get cured of their ailments,
however has gone to a popular private hospital in Adayar to get
his knee repaired.
Sources said Dinakaran underwent
a knee replacement surgery, conducted by a
team of top doctors, at the hospital yesterday
afternoon. His faith in doctors seems to have done him good as
he is said to be doing fine. Dinakaran,
who presides over the Christian gospel group Jesus
Calls, along with his
family members including his son Paul Dinakaran, has conducted
several hundred faith healing meetings across the State and
elsewhere too.
In many of
these meetings, whose footages are regularly shown in almost all
popular satellite channels, people are shown to get 'cured' of
their handicaps and illness. There are also special prayers
conducted for serious ailments. It is also said that money was
also collected for these special prayers. Obviously, tongues
will start wagging over Dinakaran's choice for his own
treatment. Perhaps there is a moral in the story: Thou shall not
pray for thyself.
(source: Miracle
healer heals himself at hospital - newstodaynet.com).
Top
of Page
Churches
cock-a-snook at TN's law
Tamilnadu
has an anti forcible conversion law in place. But that does not
seem to have deterred zealous Christian missionaries and
evangelists from carrying on with their 'aggressive expansion'.
Though
missionaries are decidedly low-key in talking about conversions
they carry out in the State now, they are not so when talking
about their expansion in terms of new churches. Christianaid,
a missionary organisation, in its website (christianaid.org),
has talked about how churches continued to be 'planted in
Tamilnadu despite 'recent restrictive law on religious
conversions'
'New
churches were dedicated in two villages near Coimbatore. One
church in particular was composed of poor people, including many
blind and maimed members. Outside help enabled the construction
a beautiful meeting hall for these people.

Tamilnadu
has an anti forcible conversion law in place. But that does not
seem to have deterred zealous Christian missionaries and
evangelists from carrying on with their 'aggressive expansion'.
***
'One
missionary who already cares for a congregation of 100 believers
has planted three additional churches in surrounding villages.
Another pioneer church planter held gospel meetings attended by
150 people,' the organisation's website proudly says.
'Tamil
Nadu passed a religious law last October that instructs all
persons wanting to convert to register their intention before
the magistrate and before the priest of the religion he wants to
leave. The person doing the converting [i.e. baptizing] also
must report to authorities. Failure to do any of these could
result in exorbitant fines of Rs. 100,000 each (over $2000 - an
impossible fee for a day laborer earning only $1 a day),' the
website's message reads and gives an address to send
contributions.
The
message inherent in this is that it has now become 'costly' to
carry on conversions in Tamilnadu, and hence donors
need to up their doles.
Anyway, the
Pope's much trumpeted 'rich harvest of souls' is well and truly
underway.
(source: Churches
cock-a-snook at TN's law - newstodaynet.com.
For more refer to chapter on Conversion).
Sign
the petition - UN
& Religious Proselytization
- petitiononline.com).
Catholic
church organises pongala - One
more act of the church appropriating Hindu ceremonies?
A pongala ritual, marked by
traditional Hindu custom, was organised by the St. Rita's
Catholic Church at Nandrikkal, near Kundara, today. The
ritual, being held for the first time at the church, was
organised as part of the annual festival, which concluded today.
Hundreds of devotees, including parishioners and those from
other communities, took part in the ritual, which was held in
the morning.
***
The
Aattukal Bhagavathi Temple dedicated to the Goddess Bhagavathi
is situated in Thiruvananthapuram city. The
temple is specially famous for Pongala, an exclusive festival
for women that falls in February/ March. The name 'Pongala'
means 'to boil over' and refers to the ritualistic offering of
porridge made of rice, sweet brown molasses, coconut gratings,
nuts and raisins. Only women devotees are allowed to participate
in this ritual. Each devotee in a clay pot on an open fire cooks
it and the long line of women making the ritual offering expands
up to East Fort and behind.
(source:
Catholic
church organises pongala -
hindu.com.
For more refer to chapter on Conversion).
Top
of Page
Maoists
bomb Hindu temple in southern Nepal, burn Buddhist bus
Maoist
rebels blew up a popular Hindu temple in southern Nepal and
separately attacked a bus carrying Buddhist pilgrims in the west
of the troubled Himalayan kingdom, a security source said. The
Ram-Janaki temple at Nijgadh town in Bara district south of
Kathmandu was completed only a few months ago with financial
contributions from locals, who
have been enraged by Tuesday night's destruction.
In the other
attack, a bus reserved for Buddhist pilgrims was set on fire
when it was returning Tuesday from Lumbini,
the birthplace of the Buddha,
by Maoist rebels who first ordered devotees to get off, the
source said.
The
Maoist "people's war" has claimed more than 8,300
lives since 1996. Violence has surged since the rebels pulled
out of a seven-month ceasefire in August.
(source:
Maoists
bomb Hindu temple in southern Nepal, burn Buddhist bus -
yahoo.com).
Top
of Page
Don't
separate yoga from source - By Rajiv Malhotra
At
a time when the West is so fussy about protecting its
intellectual property rights around the world, might it be a
good idea to have clean hands by making sure that it is not
plagiarizing the discoveries and know-how of others? Given
that the historical domination of scholarship on Hinduism was in
the control of colonialists and Christian missionaries (often
the same persons), there have been considerable distortions.
This phenomenon has been popularly known as Orientalism.
It
troubles me that some Christians stereotype Hinduism as
"world negating," "caste abusive,"
"'women abusive," "poverty causing," and
"fatalistic" and yet they appropriate from it without
acknowledgment ("A bit of a stretch at Felician: Nun joins
students in Christian yoga class," Page L-8, May 8). This
often happens in a four-stage process.
The
first is discipleship with loyalty. The second is distancing
from the source -- respect for the Hindu source, but only if
someone asks. The third is a repackaging of the original
material as Judeo-Christianity. The fourth is a denigration and
marginalization of the source by concentrating on the negative
stereotypes of Hinduism.
Yoga
seems to have entered this third stage.
It
is bothersome that some media are unable to apply quality
standards to ensure that yoga's proper basis in Hinduism is
appreciated by the public.
(source:
Don't
separate yoga from source - By Rajiv Malhotra.
For more on yoga, refer to chapter on Yoga
and Hindu Philosophy).
Subhash
Kak has written: "For
example, in the US, almost every YMCA teaches yoga, although it
is a different story that some Churches are speaking of
Christian yoga, without mentioning the origins of this
tradition. This yearning for wisdom was expressed by
Zimmer over fifty years ago when he said, 'We of the Occident
are about to arrive at a crossroads that was reached by the
thinkers of India some seven hundred years before Christ. This
is the real reason, why we become both vexed and stimulated,
uneasy and yet interested, when confronted with the concepts and
images of Indian wisdom.'
(source: Globalization
and the Knowledge Industry - By Subhash Kak - rediff.com).
For
more refer to chapter on Greater
India: Suvarnabhumi and
Sacred
Angkor
Top
of Page
First
Conference On Indo-Romuvan Culture Organized
NEW JERSEY, U.S.A., October 21, 2003: Scholars of the Indian and
Romuva (ancient indigenous Lithuanian religion) civilizations
took a step towards understanding each other. The first
conference in a series planned to increase understanding of the
ancient traditions of Indo-Romuvan civilizations was held in New
Jersey last week. The conference brought together about
forty-five eminent scholars belonging to Indian and Romuvan
tradition from Lithuania, Latvia, Mexico, North America and
India. The conference focused on four main broad topics:
Indo-European history and common roots, similarities and
peculiarities in the philosophy and theology of Indian and
Romuvan traditions, the evolution of Indian and Romuvan
traditions abroad and preservation of these traditions in the
changing world. Jonas Trinkunas from Lithuania, who has been
recently elevated to the highest priesthood position in
Lithuanian Romuva traditions, gave the keynote address. He
pointed out similarities between the ancient Indian and Romuvan
traditions. Commending the vision of ancient Indic seers he
said, "The founding principles for uniting the pagan
traditions in Europe have been inspired by the Hindu
philosophy." The conference was made possible by the
International Center for Cultural Studies (ICCS)-USA and World
Congress of Ethnic Religions (WCER), Lithuania.
(source:
First
Conference On Indo-Romuvan Culture Organized).
Top
of Page
India
forcing UK to spend more on education
Competition
and the quality of education offered by countries like India and
China is forcing the British government to reassess its
education policy and to consider spending more on universities
and research.
British
Prime Minister Tony Blair told the 'The Times' that UK had to
keep pace with India and China. "Britain needs increased
spending on the universities and research to keep pace with
countries such as India and China, which will soon be tremendous
competition for us," said Blair.
He
said it was important that the country's education system be
made up of independent state schools of real quality, which
would look after the needs of every child.
He
also said that he was not in favour of raising taxes relating to
the education sector, as this would damage the level
of competitiveness against countries such as India.
(source: India
forcing UK to spend more on education -
sifynews.com).
Top
of Page
Manu
and the Brits - By Madhu
Kishwar
Introduction:
Manu is regarded as the father of Hindu religious law, but did
Manu intend his writ to be a rigid rule book? Madhu Kishwar
declares, “He did not.”
Madhu
Kishwar, editor of Manushi magazine and a champion of the
oppressed in India, offers an astute commentary on the
persistent objections and controversies centering on Manusmriti,
or Manu Dharma Shastra, the historical Indian text which is
widely regarded as Hinduism’s most authoritative law book.
Kishwar claims that the uncontestable status given to Manusmriti
was actually imposed by the British. She goes on to suggest that Manu himself had never
intended such dogmatic and static interpretations of his
wide-ranging work.
On
March 25 of year 2000, copies of Manusmriti were burnt by
reformers protesting against the ill-conceived installation of
the statue of Manu in the precincts of the Rajasthan High Court.
The protesters believed that the ancient text is the defining
document of Brahmanical Hinduism, and also the key source of
gender and caste oppression in India. In the ensuing
controversy, defenders of Manusmriti projected it as a pivotal
canonical source of religious law for Hindus.
The
confusion is not theirs alone; these common misrepresentations
are an unfortunate by-product of our colonial education, which
we slavishly cling to, even though it is more than five decades
since we declared our independence.
We
keep defending or attacking the same hackneyed quotations from
the shastras and the epics which, incidentally, colonisers used
for the purpose of creating a new discourse about these
writings. Their inaccurate and biased interpretations have
continued to inspire major misreadings of our religious tenets.
Statue
of Sir William Jones in St. Paul's Cathedral. A colossal statue
of Jones, by John Bacon, was erected in his memory by the East
India Company. Jones in toga, rests his hands on a book, which
is his translation of Manu's Institutes, the name Manu is in
Nagari script on the spine. One might have thought it surprising
that a Dharmasastra text of the Hindu law should be on display
in the basilica of the Anglican church. The spelling is actually
"Menu," a pecularity of Jones's scheme of
transliterating Sanskrit.
(image
source: Aryans and British India - By Thomas R
Trautmann).
***
The
Englishmen who came as traders in the 17th century were
‘befuddled at the vast diversity and complexity of Indian
society Having come from a culture where many aspects of family
and community affairs came under the jurisdiction of canonical
law, they looked for similar sources of authority in India. They
assumed, for example, that just as the European marriage laws
were based in part on systematic constructions derived from
church interpretations of Biblical tenets, so must the personal
laws of various Indian communities similarly draw their
legitimacy from some priestly interpretations of fundamental
religious texts. In
the late 18th century, the British began to study the ancient
shastras to develop a set of legal principles that would assist
them in adjudicating disputes within Indian civil society. In
fact, they found there was no single body of canonical law, no
Hindu Pope to legitimize a uniform’ legal code for all the
diverse communities of India, no Shankaracharya whose writ
reigned all over the country Even religious interpretations of
popular epics like the Ramayana failed to fit the bill because
every community and every age exercised the freedom to recite
and write its own version. We have inherited hundreds of
recognized and respected versions of this text, and many are
still being created. The flourishing of such variation and
div6rsity, however, did not prevent the British from searching
for a definitive canon of Hindu law.
The
British began to mistrust the pandits and became impatient with
having to deal with such a range of customs that had no apparent
legal authority to back them, since that made it difficult for
them to pose as genuine adjudicators of Hindu law. The British
were even more nonplussed because they had a history of using
the common law system, based on precedent. However, given the
myriad opinions of the Indian pandits, they couldn’t depend on
uniform precedents to make their judgments. Anglo-Brahaminism:
In order to arrive at a definitive version of the Indian legal
system that would mainly be useful for them, the East India
Company began to recruit and train pandits for its own service,
In 1772, Warren Hastings hired a group of eleven pandits to
cooperate with the Company in the creation of a new digest of
Hindu law that would govern civil disputes in the British
courts. The Sanskrit pandits hired to translate and sanction
this new interpretation of customary laws created a curious
Anglo-Brahmanical hybrid. The resulting document, printed in
London under the title A Code of Gentoo
Laws, or, Ordinations of the Pandits was a
made-to-order text, in which the
pandits dutifully followed the demands made by their paymasters.
Though it was the first serious attempt at codification of Hindu
law, the text was far from accurate in its references to the
original sources, or to their varied traditional
interpretations.
Thus
Manusmriti came to influence oriental studies in the West far
more profoundly than it had ever influenced the practices of any
actual -living communities in pre-British India.
The British consistently promoted the myth that Hindus were
governed by their codified versions of shastric injunctions. The
modern educated elite in India, whose knowledge of India comes
mainly from English language sources, were thenceforth
systematically brainwashed into believing that the British were
actually administering Hindu personal laws through the medium of
the English courts. This was
part of a larger myth-building exercise whereby the people of
the subcontinent were taught that theirs was a stagnant
civilization. The ignorant assumption of our colonial
rulers, that social stability in India was due to the supposed
proclivity of its people to follow the same old traditions,
customs and laws that had allegedly remained moribund for
centuries, slowly came to acquire the force of self-evident
truth over a period of time, both for those supporting as well
as those opposing British rule.
Discrimination
against women or Dalits is neither inherently Hindu, nor is it
scripturally mandated. This is not to suggest that such
practices do not exist. Sadly enough, the disgraceful treatment
of Dalits and downgrading of women are among the most shameful
aspects of contemporary Indian society. But they will not
disappear by burning ancient texts because none of the Hindu
scriptures have projected themselves as commandment-giving
authorities demanding unconditional obedience from all those
claiming to be Hindus.
(source: Manu
and the Brits - By Madhu
Kishwar and Aryans and British India - By Thomas R
Trautmann
p. 76 - 77).
***
In defence of
Hindu Law
Scholars have have
ignored Hindu laws evolving character, its capacity for diversity
and flexibility, its welfare potential and the possibilities for
freedom it contains. Aided
by overzealous Indologists, all the bodies of scholarship
mentioned above make the same mistake about Hindu law: they too
quickly assimilate it to positivistic understandings of law.
They all err in thinking that Hindu law is a set of formal
rules with authoritative status rather than principles of a
"self controlled order"...
The
cumulative result is not just a serious scholarly
misunderstanding of Hindu law, but a serious misunderstanding of
Hindu society itself.
And
above all it rescues the study of Hindu law from the
historically unfounded condescension of its critics and the
unthinking zealotry of its friends...
(source:
In
defence of Hindu Law - Refer
to Hindu
Law: Beyond Tradition and Modernity - By Werner F. Menski, Oxford
University Press, 2003).
Top
of Page
Captain
Nemo a Hero in League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
USA,
November 20, 2003: Several readers wrote to inform us that
Captain Nemo, a Hindu character in the film "League of
Extraordinary Gentlemen," is, in fact, a hero in the film.
Sara Kobuszko writes, "I would like to set the story
straight regarding Captain Nemo's role in the film. Having seen
it for myself last week, I can firmly deny that Nemo plays any
sort of evil role -- he is a hero in every sense of the word.
Nemo is courteous, bold, a fast and lethal protector of his
friends, and a good captain to his crewmen. Moreover, he is also
a devoted Hindu and devotee of the
Great Goddess Kali Ma. All in all, I came away from
the film feeling that at last there has been a heroic depiction
of an Asian man in Hollywood. He was not depicted as a victim, a
coward or a terrorist, but as a complete hero, and I for one
will be wanting to see him again on screen."
Often
considered a pirate by those who have heard of his attacks on
Imperialist British ships, Nemo is in fact a freedom fighter,
dedicated to bringing down the British Empire and pushing them
out of his native country, India. To this end, he has assembled
not only his amazing array of weapons and inventions, but also a
small army who serve as his renegade security force and ship's
crew. Nemo is the technological heart of the Extraordinary
Gentlemen. Nemo is driven by his quest for freedom - his
interest in the League is practical. If his mission is
successful, he hopes that he will be able to move Britain to
loosen their oppressive shackles from his people. We wanted to
introduce Hindu elements to establish a certain symbolism and
spirituality to his enigmatic character. Nemo is a highly
principled man, reflected in the vesselˇ¦s orderly, harmonic
appearance.
(source: Captain
Nemo a Hero in League of Extraordinary Gentlemen -
HPI and rottentomatoes.com).
Top
of Page
What
is Indian Secularism ?
"The
Indian press, like most of its
Third World counterparts, puts a premium on all that is modern
and condemns as degenerate all that is traditional...In order to
put the stamp of legitimacy on modernization, we have to believe
that the traditional civilization was inhuman."
"Instilling
guilt about the "evils of Hindu society" is indeed a
favorite weapon of the secularist elite."
- Professor
Ashish Nandy
is a political psychologist, sociologist and director of Delhi's
Center for the Study of Developing Societies.
***
1. There is no God but Mahatma Gandhi, and Pandit Nehru is his
Prophet.
2. Secularism is the greatest good, to which all other goods are
subordinate.
3. Marxists, mullahs, and missionaries are the clergy of
Secularism.
4. Those who are not secular are communal. To question
Secularism is to be a Hindu fundamentalist.
5. Hinduism is the opiate of the Indian masses.
6. Jihads and crusades against Hindus are secular. To convert
Hindus is a secular right. Winning converts back into Hinduism
is communalism.
7. Falsification of history and
negationism are necessary for the sake of Secularism.
Children should be indoctrinated in Secularism from an early
age.
8. Hinduism is the construct and preserve of invading Aryan
barbarians and their descendants. The autochthons are not
Hindus. However, when any of the autochthons assault Christians
or Muslims (who, by definition, are Secularists), they are to be
termed Hindus.
9. Hindu beliefs are myths. Christian
and Muslim beliefs are religion.
10. Only Hindus are communal; others fight for their human,
secular and minority rights.
11. Hindus have no human rights; others have both human rights
and special privileges.
12. Secularists cannot be Hindu. They can call themselves of
"Hindu descent", or "good Muslims", or
"good Christians", or "good humans", but
never, never "good Hindus".
13. Christian and Muslim acts of assertion are Secularism. Hindu
acts of assertion are fanaticism. Hindus who do not say all
religions are equal, or are equally good, or who do not
subscribe to sarvadharma samabhava are Hindu Nazis.
14. Hindu lives are cheap. According to the Sharia, they are
worth 1/16 the life of a Muslim. According to Secularism, they
are worth-less.
15. NGOs and other organizations that do not cater to Muslim or
Christian relief needs are fascist. To cater to their needs
preferentially is Secularism.
16. India will be a fully secular state only when all Hindus are
converted to Secularism.
17.
Being the majority community, Hindus do not qualify for
victimhood even in case of unprovoked attacks.
18. By virtue of the Secular decree, Hindus are designated to be
non-entities in their own land.
19. A community's clout and muscle power is inversely
proportional to its number count.
As
Arun Shourie has rightly put it, "Secularism is nothing but
branding other people as Communal"!
He once told at Hyderabad at a meeting organised by Pragnya
Bharathi, that in Europe Secularism is used by State as a
protection from CHURCH , but in India it is used as umbrella .
These secularists know how to rationalise almost everything
right from terrorism to Anti-National Activities .
(source:
What
is Indian Secularism ? -
South Asia Analysis Group).
India's
"Succular" (sic) thinkers, writers, artistes and
politicians
Abuse of the word Hindu
So, one of our
new secular ministers tells us that the Sindhu
Darshan festival, started by the last government to
celebrate the river India gets her name from, will be made less
communal. Excuse me?
The
word Hindu is being used as a term of abuse. Hindu
fanatic, Hindu fundamentalism, Hindu nationalist, Hindutva.
Mostly, that is how the word Hindu gets used and nearly always
pejoratively.
It
bothers me that I went to school and college in this country
without any idea of the enormous contribution of Hindu
civilisation to the history of the world. It
bothers me that even today our children, whether they go to
state schools or expensive private ones, come out without any
knowledge of their own culture or civilisation.
You
cannot be proud of a heritage you know nothing about, and in the
name of secularism, we have spent 50 years in total denial of
the Hindu roots of this civilisation. We have done
nothing to change a colonial system of mass education founded on
the principle that Indian civilisation had nothing to offer. For
me, evidence of our contempt for our culture and civilisation
manifests itself in the fact that there is not a single Indian
city where you will find a major bookshop that sells books in
Indian languages. Is this not evidence of a country that
continues to be colonised to the core? Our
contempt for who we are gets picked up these days by the Western
press, which routinely uses the word Hindu in a pejorative
sense.
I
believe that the Indic religions have made much less trouble for
the world than the Semitic ones and that Hindu civilisation is
something I am very proud of. If that is evidence of my being
‘‘communal’’, then, my inner voice tells me, so be it.
(source:
This
inner voice too needs hearing - By Tavleen Singh -
indianexpress.com).
Top
of Page
Pandharpur
– Homage to a Dutiful son
Pandharpur,
a town in Maharashtra on the west coast of India, is a famous
pilgrimage centre. Thousands of people from far and near visit
Pandharpur round the year for a bath in the Chandrabhaga river
and darshan of Vithal, the presiding deity. For several
hundred years, the saint-poets of Maharashtra have sung in
praise of Vithal. The compositions of Sant Gyaneshwar, Sant
Eknath, Sant Namdev, Sant Tukaram and the poetess Mukta Bai,
though written hundreds of years ago, are current even now.
These compositions guide one to the path of piety, truthfulness,
devotion and dedication.

Pandharpur is
famous for the image of Vithal in the temple: Vithal
has been standing ever since on the brick, with his arms akimbo,
waiting for Pundlik to find time for Him!
***
Pandharpur is famous for the image
of Vithal in the temple. As the legend has it,
Pundlik, an obedient and dutiful son, lived in Pandharpur ages
ago. For him the sole purpose of life was attending to his aged
parents. Nothing else mattered. It is said that Lord Vishnu was
so impressed by his devotion to his parents that he decided to
express his appreciation in person. He, therefore, came to
Pandharpur and announced himself. But Pundlik had no time for
Him because he was busy attending to his parents. He
threw a brick and asked Lord Vishnu, who had appeared in a human
form as Vithal, to stand on it and wait. So, Vithal has been
standing ever since on the brick, with his arms akimbo, waiting
for Pundlik to find time for Him!
Both
the dutiful son and the God, who has been waiting patiently for
several millennia for the day when the son will find time for
Him have been the subjects of devotional poetry in Maharashtra
for hundreds of years. The compositions, in the language of the
common man, are sung by one and all - be it a farmer or a
housewife.
The emphasis of all the saint-poets has been the
unity of mankind and the equality of all men and women. No
wonder then that they are popular among all classes.
The
educated read Gyaneshwari, the treatise of the Bhagwad
Gita by Sant Gyaneshwar, while the unlettered recite
the compositions of Sant Tukaram and women sing the compositions
of poetess Mukta Bai. For the people, Vithal is an object of
veneration. They come to the place as often as they can,
particularly during the monsoons when the gods are believed to
descend here for rest. Though all means of transport are
utilised for visiting the shrine, the most common way of making
the pilgrimage is on foot.
From the countryside the pilgrims
or warkaris as they are
called, form groups known as dindis
and head for Pandharpur, carrying flags
and festoons and singing devotional songs. The pilgrims come
from all classes of society. The rich and the poor, the educated
and the unlettered all go there in search of inner peace. Not
only that, devotion to Vithal also transcends the barriers of
faith as people belonging to other religions are also found
among the dindis.
(source: Pandharpur
– Homage to a Dutiful son - By K G
Joglekar).
Top
of Page
30
BC, Egyptian Diwali? - By Arvind
Joshi
Diwali
is one of the most popular festivals in India and is celebrated
with much eagerness. Yet, like most festivals the world over,
even Diwali has its distant cousin --- a festival of lights
celebrated in Egypt as long back as 30 BC!
The
Egyptian festival worshipped the goddess Isis. She was often
shown having horns of a cow on her head, sometimes even as a
woman with the head of a cow. The worship of Isis also similar
to our own Laxmi Puja during Diwali.
One of the main features of the festival was the nocturnal
illumination. People lit rows of oil-lamps outside of their
houses, and the lamps burnt all night long. Lighting lamps
throughout the night is a ritual that gives our festival its
name 'Diwali' from deep (lamp)
and awali (rows).
The exact
date of the Egyptian festival is described in the same book as
'the 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th of November', again, almost the
same time as our own celebrations.In India, the earthen lamps are lit to illumine the path of
Goddess Laxmi and welcome her into one's house. In Egypt, too,
lamps are lit to welcome the ghost of their ancestors.
It is likely that people who lived so far from our own India, in
a different age and time, moved by similar sentiments, sensing a
subtle change in the smell of the air, the change of seasons,
wove a story -albeit about different gods- but celebrated like
our very own festival of lights!
(source:
30
BC, Egyptian Diwali? - By Arvind
Joshi
- For more refer to chapter India
and Egypt).
Top
of Page
Naga rebels use
conversion for control
It is not in jest that people in Arunachal
Pradesh say that Naga insurgency is a bigger threat to them than
China.
But what he
said in public was only the tip of the iceberg. State district
and police officials reveal that these two districts are more or
less under the control of Naga insurgents, especially the NSCN
(Isaac-Muivah). ‘‘Whatever you may hear in Delhi about the
positive trend of the Centre’s talks with the NSCN (I-M),
their goal of a Greater Nagaland is on course. Tirap and
Changlang — bordering both Nagaland and Myanmar — are almost
under the control of insurgents,’’ said an official, a fact
also confirmed by Home Ministry sources.
One of the
ways, by which the NSCN (I-M) is trying to control the
administration of the two districts, is through conversion to
Christianity. ‘‘The demographic
profile of the state, especially of the two districts, has
changed over the past decade. From 2,000 in 1991, the number of
Christians in the state is almost 2,00,000 now,’’ said a
state government official.
And
according to the general secretary of Rangfraa Faith Promotion
Society in Changlang, Latsam Khimhun, most of these conversions
were forcible. Rangfraa is a Hindu tribal who alleges that NSCN
(I-M) rebels raided Tirap and Changlang, razed Rangfraa temples,
and forced the residents to adopt Christianity.
Quoting an
instance, Khimhun said, some NSCN (I-M) members came to Thanyang
and Kangkho villages in Changlang on May 13, and again on May
15, asking the people to convert. ‘‘When
they refused, the insurgents burnt down the temples,’’
Khimhun said. IG P.N. Aggarwal said half-dozen missionaries were
arrested about five months ago when some people reported that
they were being pressurized to convert. ‘‘They (the
missionaries) were in jail for a month before they got
bail,’’ he said.
(source: Naga
rebels use conversion for control
-
indianexpress.com).
For
more refer to chapter on Caste
System and Conversion
and Indians
Against Christian Aggression.
Sign
the petition - UN
& Religious Proselytization
- petitiononline.com).
Refer
to VINDICATED BY TIME: The Niyogi Committee Report On
Christian Missionary Activities -
Christianity
Missionary Activities Enquiry Committee 1956
and
The
Sunshine of Secularism.
Top
of Page
Americans
losing jobs to Indians, Chinese
Increased competition
from India, China and Mexico are among reasons for job loss in
the United States, according to an international development
council survey.
"The
shift of manufacturing and service jobs offshore and increased
global competition from countries, especially China, India and
Mexico, are two of the biggest factors having a negative impact
on job growth in US cities and states," an advanced release
of the survey stated in Washington.
The
survey, scheduled to be released to the media on Wednesday, was
conducted among 900 economic development officials in all 50
states. Another concern of these officials, directly responsible
for bringing jobs to cities and states, is "the pace of the
US national economic recovery." contradicting President
Bush, a majority of the survey respondents said that the federal
tax stimulus has had "little or no impact on creating new
jobs in their communities”.
(source: Americans
losing jobs to Indians, Chinese -
indianexpress.com). For more refer to Wrong
Portrayal of Indian-Americans/India By Lou Dobbs - CNN).
Top
of Page
Readers
Digest apologizes for distorted Indian map
Jabalpur: Readers Digest (RD) has tendered unconditional
apology to the Madhya Pradesh High Court for publishing a
distorted map of India in its January 2002 issue.
The magazine, in its January 2002
issue, had published an Indian map showing Jammu and Kashmir
outside the geographical borders of the country.
Justice A K Mishra yesterday (Dec 25, 2003) disposed off the
petition filed by N S Thakur, who prayed for action against the
respondents - magazine editor Ashok Mahadevan and Henry Hurt,
the writer of the article - for publishing the distorted map.
The petitioner claimed that he along
with thousands of Indians were hurt by the aforesaid publication
having an "effect on the integrity of the nation and
encouraging subversive activities in the country".
"The map be treated at par with
Indian national flag, National Anthem and Constitution of India
and be made part of the act of the Prevention of Insults to
National Honours Act 1971," he said.
Mahadevan and Hurt submitted an unconditional apology before the
court. Justice Mishra observed that the editor and the writer ought
to know that publication of incorrect map is a punishable
offence in India.
The magazine published the correct map in its November 2003
issue.
"The apology and correct map of India ought to have been
published by respondents during the pendency of the petition
before November 2003, which would have saved them from criminal
prosecution," the judge observed.
(source: Readers
Digest apologises for distorted Indian map - indiainfo.com).
Top
of Page
Did You Know?
Saladin's
sword
The
original Damascus steel-the world's first high-carbon steel-was
a product of India
Saladin the Saracen
had a steely edge over Richard the Lion-hearted. Sir Walter
Scott, in his romance The Talisman, describes a meeting of the
two mediaeval monarchs who crossed swords in the Crusades.
After
examining an iron bar that Richard cut in two with his sword,
Saladin took a silk cushion from the floor and placed it upright
on one end. "Can thy weapon, my brother, sever that
cushion?" he said to King Richard.
"No,
surely," replied the King, "no sword on earth, were it
the Excalibur of King Arthur, can cut that which poses no steady
resistance to the blow."
"Mark,
then," said Saladin and unsheathed his scimitar, a curved
and narrow blade of a dull blue colour, marked with ten millions
of meandering lines and drew it across the cushion, applying the
edge so dexterously that the cushion seemed rather to fall
asunder than to be divided by violence.
Scott
mentions that the sabres and poniards of the Ayyubid troops were
of Damascene steel.
The
original Damascus steel-the world's first high-carbon steel-was
a product of India known as wootz. Wootz is the English for ukku
in Kannada and Telugu, meaning steel. Indian steel
was used for making swords and armour in Persia and Arabia in
ancient times. Ktesias at the court of Persia (5th c BC)
mentions two swords made of Indian steel which the Persian king
presented him. The pre-Islamic Arab
word for sword is 'muhannad' meaning from Hind.
Wootz
was produced by carburising chips of wrought iron in a closed
crucible process. "Wrought iron, wood and carbonaceous
matter was placed in a crucible and heated in a current of hot
air till the iron became red hot and plastic. It was then
allowed to cool very slowly (about 24 hours) until it absorbed a
fixed amount of carbon, generally 1.2 to 1.8 per cent,"
said eminent metallurgist Prof. T.R. Anantharaman, who taught at
Banares Hindu University, Varanasi. "When forged into a
blade, the carbides in the steel formed a visible pattern on the
surface." To the sixth century Arab poet Aus b. Hajr the
pattern appeared described 'as if it were the trail of small
black ants that had trekked over the steel while it was still
soft'.
In
the early 1800s, Europeans tried their hand at reproducing wootz
on an industrial scale. Michael Faraday, the great experimenter
and son of a blacksmith, tried to duplicate the steel by
alloying iron with a variety of metals but failed. Some
scientists were successful in forging wootz but they still were
not able to reproduce its characteristics, like the watery mark.
"Scientists believe that some other micro-addition went
into it," said Anantharaman. "That is why the
separation of carbide takes place so beautifully and
geometrically."
Francis
Buchanan and other European travellers have observed the
manufacture of steel by crucible process at several places in
Mysore, Malabar and Golconda from the 17th century onwards. The
furnace sketched by Buchanan shows that crucibles were packed in
rows of 15 inside a pit filled with ash. A wall separated the
bellows from the furnace, with only the snout of the bellows
sticking out through the wall. Each crucible could contain up to
14 ounces of iron, along with stems and leaves.
The
crucible process could have originated in south India and the
finest steel was from the land of Cheras, said K.
Rajan, associate professor of archaeology at Tamil University,
Thanjavur, who explored a 1st century AD trade centre at
Kodumanal near Coimbatore. Rajan's excavations revealed an
industrial economy at Kodumanal.
Pillar
of strength The rustless wonder called the Iron Pillar near the
Qutb Minar at Mehrauli in Delhi did not attract the attention of
scientists till the second quarter of the 19th century. The inscription refers
to a ruler named Chandra, who had conquered the Vangas and
Vahlikas, and the breeze of whose valour still perfumed the
southern ocean. "The king who answers the description is
none but Samudragupta, the real founder of the Gupta
empire," said Prof. T.R. Anantharaman, who has authored The
Rustless Wonder.
Zinc
metallurgy travelled from India to China and from there to
Europe. As late as 1735, professional chemists in Europe
believed that zinc could not be reduced to metal except in the
presence of copper. The alchemical texts of the mediaeval period
show that the tradition was live in India.
In
1738, William Champion established the Bristol process to
produce metallic zinc in commercial quantities and got a patent
for it. Interestingly, the mediaeval alchemical text
Rasaratnasamucchaya describes the same process, down to adding
1.5 per cent common salt to the ore.
(source: Saladin's
sword -
By The Week - June 24, 2001). http://netinfo.hypermart.net/telingsteel.htm.
For more refer to chapter Hindu
Culture1).
Refer to Delhi
Iron Pillar - By Prof. R. Balasubramaniam - Professor
Department of Materials and Metallurgical Engng Indian Institute
of Technology, Kanpur 208016. Contributed to this
site by Prof. R. Balasubramaniam. URL : http://home.iitk.ac.in/~bala
As early as the 17th century
Europe knew of India's ability to make crucible steel from reports
brought back by several travellers who had observed the process
at several places in southern India. Several attempts were made
to import the process, but failed because the exact technique
remained a mystery. Studies of wootz were made in an attempt to
understand its secrets, including a major effort by the famous
scientist,Michael Faraday son of a blacksmith. (source: http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucible_steel).
Top
of Page
|